MCP Compact
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Compact
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConsolidates multiple upstream MCP servers behind a single STDIO interface, exposing search_tools and run_tool to avoid context bloat.53 npm17MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAggregates multiple MCP servers behind a single stdio interface, supporting stdio-based and HTTP SSE-based upstreams with OAuth.2 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAggregates multiple upstream MCP servers (stdio, streamable-http, sse, websocket) behind a single streamable-HTTP endpoint with declarative configuration, namespacing, filtering, and auto-reload.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceStarts local MCP backend servers only when their tools are called, exposes their tools through a single stdio gateway, preserves stateful sessions, and can stop safely restartable backends after idle timeouts.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAggregates multiple MCP sub-servers into a single unified entry point, supporting stdio and Streamable HTTP protocols, with a web-based management interface for configuration, routing, and tool management.17 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAggregates multiple backend MCP servers (Stdio, SSE, and Streamable HTTP) into a single unified endpoint, exposing their combined tools and resources via SSE, Streamable HTTP, or Stdio. It also offers an optional web admin UI for managing server connections, tool enablement, and live configuration reloads.52 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are clearly separated by purpose: invoke handles tool calls and read handles resource access. The descriptions provide explicit examples and modes to guide usage, though the generic proxy nature could occasionally blur the line between a tool and a resource.
Both tool names are single-word verbs in a consistent imperative style, making them predictable and easy to remember. There is no mixing of conventions or misleading synonyms.
With only two tools, the set is intentionally minimal but well-suited for a compact projection surface that forwards to a larger MCP ecosystem. While it feels thin compared to direct-integration servers, its purpose justifies the small count.
The server covers the core interaction patterns (invoking tools and reading resources) and includes validation/preview modes. However, it lacks an explicit discovery mechanism to list available servers, tools, or resource templates, which could be a significant gap for agents without prior knowledge.