Skip to main content
Glama
quality-screener

Quality Screener MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Quality Screener MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive stock screening capabilities through Yahoo Finance. Enables LLMs to screen stocks based on technical, fundamental, and options criteria, with support for watchlist management and result storage.
      4
      49
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read cited stock news, earnings, and filings; screen stocks; run point-in-time backtests; check portfolios; and query a local dashboard across US, A-share, and Hong Kong markets.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search, screen, and analyze 8,200+ NSE and BSE listed securities through 55 tools covering live quotes, financials, technical indicators, FII/DII flows, option chains, filings, IPOs, bulk deals, and portfolio P&L.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with market screening, analysis, and scoring across stocks, crypto, and forex, enabling natural language queries for trading insights.
      4
      44 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides derived financial intelligence for AI agents, including insider activity analysis, earnings surprises, institutional moves, stock screening with a proprietary composite value score, and macro indicators.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search, screen and analyze all 8,200+ NSE and BSE listed stocks, covering live quotes, financials, technical indicators, FII/DII flows, option chains, filings, IPOs and portfolio tracking through 55 tools.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to a distinct resource/action (scores queries, history, systems CRUD, tickers/filters), and the descriptions clearly separate custom score computation from canned score lookups. A few pairs overlap conceptually, such as scores_list vs scores_top or auth_status vs account_profile, but their output shapes and inputs make them distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names are predominantly snake_case and follow a resource-prefix pattern like scores_*, systems_*, history_*, and tickers_*. Minor deviations such as score_compute (singular vs the plural scores_* family), screen_share (noun_verb rather than resource_verb), and the non-action names auth_status/health keep it from being fully consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 23 tools the surface is heavy and falls in the borderline 16-25 range; some tools like scores_top, scores_for_tickers, and history_top overlap with list/batch operations and could be consolidated. The broad scope (auth, scores, screens, systems, history) justifies most of the count, but it is not tight.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are well covered: score retrieval, custom score computation, saved-system CRUD, screen sharing, filters, tickers, history, and health/auth. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to fetch a shared screen by slug and no direct score-comparison tool, but agents can work around these without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive