Skip to main content
Glama

research.md

PyPI CI License: MIT Python 3.11+

The decision forge. An MCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows so AI agents cannot skip rigor under time pressure.

What it enforces

Evidence gates (upstream)

Gate

Trigger

2+ sources for CONFIRMED evidence

finding_create / finding_update fail if upgrading to CONFIRMED with < 2 sources

Disconfirmation search required

finding_create / finding_update fail if upgrading to CONFIRMED without documenting what you searched to disprove the claim

Content hash for REASONED+

Source must include content_hash: proving the agent fetched and read the material

Web research nudge

Tool returns advisory when findings have no sources

Vendor-only warning

Advisory when all sources are VENDOR tier

Landscape scan advisory

Nudge on first candidate to document the full option landscape

Process gates (downstream)

Gate

Trigger

Criteria locked before scoring

candidate_score fails if decision-criteria.md not locked

No TBD on scored candidates

candidate_score fails if candidate has _TBD_ claims

Peer review before scoring

candidate_score fails if no evaluations/peer-review.md

Related MCP server: agent-gate

Install

pip install research-md

Or install from source:

pip install -e ".[dev]"

MCP configuration

Add to your Claude Code config:

claude mcp add research-md --scope user -- research-md

Or add to .mcp.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "research-md": {
      "command": "research-md"
    }
  }
}

Agent workflow

A typical research session follows this path:

project_set          Register project, get research_id
    |
finding_create       Record claims with evidence grades (UNVERIFIED -> LOW -> REASONED -> CONFIRMED)
    |                Tool nudges: "Use WebSearch to find sources"
finding_update       Add sources, disconfirmation search, upgrade evidence grade
    |                Gate: CONFIRMED requires 2+ sources + disconfirmation
candidate_create     Define options to evaluate
    |                Advisory: "Document the full landscape before narrowing"
criteria_lock        Freeze decision criteria weights
    |
peer_review_log      Log reviewer assessment
    |
candidate_score      Score candidates (gated on criteria + peer review + no TBD)
    |
project_decide       Record the decision with rationale

Evidence grade ladder

Grade

Meaning

Requirements

UNVERIFIED

Claim recorded, not yet investigated

None -- tool nudges toward web research

LOW

Single source or anecdotal

At least a coherent argument

REASONED

Credible source, verified consultation

1+ source with content_hash: proof

CONFIRMED

Confirmed -- validated by evidence

2+ independent sources + disconfirmation search

Source quality tiers

Each source is tagged with a tier for awareness (no hard gate):

Tier

Examples

PRIMARY

Census data, RFC specs, user study results

EXPERT

PMC papers, RAND reports, Thoughtworks Radar

SECONDARY

Blog roundups, tutorials, comparison guides

VENDOR

Company blog comparing itself to competitors

Trilogy conventions

research.md follows shared conventions with ike.md and visionlog. See CONVENTIONS.md for the full standard.

  • research.md -- decide with evidence (this tool)

  • visionlog -- record the decision as a contract

  • ike.md -- execute tasks within those contracts

Config lives at .research/research.json (committed to git).

Targeting pattern: project_set + research_id

Every tool call requires a research_id -- the GUID from .research/research.json. This is an in-memory mapping that does not persist across MCP server restarts.

  1. Call project_set with the project's absolute path

  2. It returns the project's research_id (a UUID)

  3. Pass that research_id on every subsequent tool call

If you call a tool without a valid research_id, the server tells you exactly how to fix it.

Project structure

Single project

my-research/
  .research/
    research.json              <- config with project GUID (commit this)
    findings/                  <- NNNN-slug.md
    candidates/                <- slug.md
    evaluations/
      decision-criteria.md     <- criteria table (lock before scoring)
      peer-review.md           <- reviewer log (required before scoring)
      scoring-matrix.md        <- generated from locked criteria + candidates

Multi-project root

research-root/
  .research/
    research.json              <- root config (lists subprojects)
  vendor-selection/
    .research/
      research.json            <- subproject GUID
      findings/
      candidates/
      evaluations/

Initialize: project_init { path, root: true } then project_init { path, subproject: "name" }. When you project_set a root, all subprojects are registered automatically.

Tools (20)

Session

Tool

Description

project_set

Register a project path, returns its GUID. Also registers subprojects if root.

project_get

List all registered projects and their GUIDs for this session.

Project

Tool

Description

project_init

Initialize project structure (single, root, or subproject).

status

Project health: evidence gate status, criteria locked, peer review, TBD count, finding/candidate totals.

Findings

Tool

Description

finding_create

Create finding with evidence grade, sources array, and disconfirmation. Nudges toward web research.

finding_list

List all findings with status and evidence grade.

finding_update

Update status, evidence grade, sources, disconfirmation, or claim. Gates CONFIRMED evidence.

Candidates

Tool

Description

candidate_create

Create candidate for evaluation. Landscape advisory on first candidate.

candidate_list

List all candidates with verdict status.

candidate_update

Update verdict (provisional/recommended/eliminated) or description.

candidate_add_claim

Add binary testable claim to validation checklist.

candidate_resolve_claim

Mark a claim Y or N (clears _TBD_).

Scoring

Tool

Description

criteria_lock

Lock decision criteria weights. Required before scoring.

candidate_score

Score a candidate against locked criteria. Gated on criteria lock + peer review + no TBD.

scoring_matrix_generate

Generate comparison table from locked criteria + scored candidates.

Peer Review

Tool

Description

peer_review_log

Log reviewer name and findings. Required before scoring.

Decision

Tool

Description

project_decide

Record the final decision with rationale.

project_supersede

Mark a decided project as superseded by new research.

research_brief

Generate a layered research brief from a completed project.

research_report

Generate a full untruncated research report.

Development

pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest
ruff check .

License

MIT -- see LICENSE.

A
license - permissive license
-
quality - not tested
D
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/eidos-agi/research.md'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server