Skip to main content
Glama
qpiai

Zoho Projects MCP Server

by qpiai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Zoho Projects MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Zoho CRM MCP Server

      junnaisystems
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Zoho CRM data through secure OAuth authentication, supporting comprehensive CRM operations including record management, search, bulk operations, and lead conversion.
      3
      MIT

    • ProjectHub MCP Server

      compagnt
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with ProjectHub for comprehensive project management through natural language. It provides 25 tools to manage tasks, workspaces, time tracking, notes, and discussions via the ProjectHub API.
      47
      16 npm
      MIT

    • Todocko MCP Server

      brnt-cz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Todocko application data, including tasks, projects, worklogs, and attachments. It supports comprehensive project management operations such as tracking activity, managing Kanban boards, and handling shared project synchronization.
      MIT

    • Freshrelease MCP Server

      dasscoax
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to interact with Freshrelease project management platform through API integration. Supports creating and retrieving projects and tasks, managing status categories, and automating project operations through natural language.
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. Tools are organized by resource (issue, phase, project, task, portal, user) and action (create, get, list, update, delete, search), making it easy for an agent to select the right one. Overlap is minimal, such as list_issues vs. search, but their descriptions clarify distinct use cases.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as create_issue, get_project, list_tasks, update_task, and delete_project. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and easy to navigate for an agent.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 20 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a project management domain covering multiple resources like issues, tasks, projects, portals, phases, and users. It feels comprehensive rather than bloated, though it borders on the upper limit of ideal scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for the domain, including create, get, list, update, and delete operations for key resources like issues, tasks, and projects. There are no obvious gaps, and tools like search and list_users add useful functionality, ensuring agents can handle typical workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources