Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nvimNoPath to a private same-user Neovim socket passed via --nvim for the reverse editor bridge.
configNoPath to an operator-reviewed TOML file passed via --config; explicitly approves loading that configuration.
trustedNoSet to "true" to include --trusted and enable project edits and explicitly configured named checks; default is read-only.false
workspaceYesAbsolute path to the project workspace passed via --workspace. Rose appends this flag for the MCP server.
editor-timeoutNoEditor request timeout in seconds passed via --editor-timeout (0.1–660).120

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

Trusted workspace named checks only. Missing checks never verify.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
flow_runC

Bounded local planner/coder/reviewer run with real verification

flow_statusC

Local health, configured models/checks, editor capabilities

flow_checkC

Run operator-configured named checks; never arbitrary argv

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

C2.8/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation4/5

flow_run (planner/coder/reviewer pipeline) and flow_check (named operator checks) are distinguished by their descriptions, though both perform 'verification-like' work and could be confused in edge cases. flow_status is clearly separate as a read-only info tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

All three tools share a clean flow_ prefix with snake_case, which is predictable. Minor quibble: run and check are verbs while status is a noun, but the pattern remains easy to read.

Tool Count3/5

Three tools is on the thin side for a workflow orchestrator; run/status/check covers the basics but feels like a minimal surface. It is borderline rather than mismatched, given the focused purpose.

Completeness3/5

Core lifecycle (execute a run, inspect status, run checks) is present, but there is no way to discover available check names, cancel an in-flight run, or retrieve prior run results/logs. These are notable gaps that could cause agent dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues