Skip to main content
Glama

asana-mcp

MCP server + typed TypeScript client for the Asana API.

Two ways to use it:

  1. MCP server (asana-mcp bin) — gives MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, MCP Inspector, any mcporter-style runner) a guarded Asana tool surface over stdio.

  2. Client library (asana-mcp/client) — a small typed Asana REST client for direct in-process use in Node services, with retry/backoff and normalized errors.

Unofficial. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Asana, Inc. If you want Asana's hosted, OAuth-based MCP integration for interactive AI assistants, see Asana's official MCP server — this package exists for headless / personal-access-token use cases (service bots, automation, server-side integrations), which the official server does not support.

Design choices

  • No delete tools, in any mode. Destructive removal is excluded from the tool surface by design.

  • Write access is opt-in and tiered (read_only → restricted → full), so an AI agent can be given exactly as much write capability as you intend — down to an allowlist of specific custom fields.

  • Zero baked-in account specifics. Workspace, fields, and tokens all arrive via environment variables.

Related MCP server: Asana MCP Server

MCP server

ASANA_ACCESS_TOKEN=0/123abc... npx asana-mcp

Environment

Variable

Required

Description

ASANA_ACCESS_TOKEN

yes

Asana personal access token

ASANA_MCP_WRITE_MODE

no

read_only (default), restricted, or full

ASANA_MCP_WRITABLE_CUSTOM_FIELDS

no

Comma-separated custom field GIDs writable in restricted mode

ASANA_MCP_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE

no

Default workspace GID for list/search tools

Write modes

Mode

Registered write tools

Notes

read_only

none

Default. Read tools only.

restricted

asana_add_comment, asana_update_task

asana_update_task may modify only custom fields whose GIDs are in ASANA_MCP_WRITABLE_CUSTOM_FIELDS; every other task field is rejected.

full

+ asana_create_task, unrestricted asana_update_task

Still no delete tools.

Tools

Read (always): asana_get_task, asana_list_tasks, asana_list_task_comments, asana_list_task_attachments, asana_get_user, asana_list_project_sections, asana_list_tasks_in_section, asana_typeahead_search.

Write (per mode, above): asana_add_comment, asana_update_task, asana_create_task.

Example MCP client config

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "asana": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["asana-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "ASANA_ACCESS_TOKEN": "0/123abc...",
        "ASANA_MCP_WRITE_MODE": "restricted",
        "ASANA_MCP_WRITABLE_CUSTOM_FIELDS": "1200000000000001,1200000000000002",
        "ASANA_MCP_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE": "1100000000000001"
      }
    }
  }
}

Client library

import { AsanaClient, AsanaApiError } from 'asana-mcp/client';

const asana = new AsanaClient({ accessToken: process.env.ASANA_ACCESS_TOKEN! });

const task = await asana.getTask('1300000000000001', {
  optFields: 'name,notes,assignee.name,custom_fields.display_value',
});

await asana.addComment(task.gid, {
  text: 'Done!',
  htmlText: '<body><strong>Done!</strong></body>', // tried first, falls back to text
});

await asana.setAssignee(task.gid, null); // unassign

for await (const t of asana.iterateTasks({
  project: '1400000000000001',
  optFields: 'name,completed',
  limit: 100,
})) {
  // auto-follows pagination
}

Client behavior

  • Retries 429 (honoring Retry-After), 500/502/503/504, and network errors with exponential backoff + jitter (default 3 retries, base 500 ms).

  • Per-attempt timeout (default 30 s) via AbortController.

  • Errors throw AsanaApiError with .status, .body, and .request — non-retryable 4xx throws immediately.

  • Injectable fetchImpl for tests; everything is constructor-configurable (baseUrl, maxRetries, timeoutMs, retryBaseDelayMs).

Surface: getTask, listTasks, iterateTasks, createTask, updateTask, setAssignee, getTaskStories, getStory, addComment, getTaskAttachments, getUser, getProjectSections, listTasksInSection, typeaheadSearch. (No delete methods — see design choices.)

Development

npm install
npm test        # vitest unit suite (mocked fetch — no network, no token needed)
npm run build   # tsc → build/
npm run inspector  # poke the server with MCP Inspector

License

MIT

Available Tools

8 tools
asana_get_taskA

Get an Asana task by GID, including any requested opt_fields (name, notes, assignee, custom_fields, memberships, etc).

Inputs: task_gid (required), opt_fields.

asana_get_userA

Get an Asana user by GID (or "me") — name, email, etc.

Inputs: user_gid (required), opt_fields.

asana_list_project_sectionsC

List the sections of a project.

Inputs: project_gid (required), opt_fields.

asana_list_task_attachmentsB

List attachments on a task (name, host, download_url).

Inputs: task_gid (required), opt_fields.

asana_list_task_commentsB

List the stories (comments and system events) on a task. Filter client-side on type="comment" for human comments.

Inputs: task_gid (required), opt_fields.

asana_list_tasksA

List tasks filtered by workspace+assignee, project, or section. Use completed_since="now" for incomplete tasks only.

Inputs: workspace, assignee, project, section, +5 more.

asana_list_tasks_in_sectionC

List the tasks in a section.

Inputs: section_gid (required), opt_fields, completed_since, limit, +1 more.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: get_task, get_user, list_project_sections, list_task_attachments, list_task_comments, list_tasks, list_tasks_in_section, and typeahead_search all have clearly different purposes with minimal overlap.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent 'verb_noun' pattern (e.g., get_task, list_tasks), but 'typeahead_search' breaks the verb-first convention, using a noun modifier instead. The inconsistency is minor.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 8 tools, the server is reasonably scoped for a read-only Asana client. It covers essential retrieval operations without being too heavy, though it lacks write capabilities.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely limited to read operations only, missing common CRUD (create, update, delete) and other important resources like projects, workspaces, and portfolios. This makes it incomplete for full Asana workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers