sanctionwise
Related Servers
Alternatives to sanctionwise
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceThe deterministic fact-verification layer for AI agents. Validates the structured facts an agent emits — IBANs, payment cards, VAT and national tax IDs, crypto and bank addresses, domains, emails, phone numbers, securities and academic identifiers, plus dates, currencies and holidays — against checksums and curated authoritative data, not guesses.561Apache 2.0
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceScreens names and companies against OFAC, EU, UK, and UN sanctions lists with fuzzy-match scores, supporting bulk lookups for AML/KYC checks. Data is sourced directly from official government lists and cached for fast repeat checks.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceVerifica se um nome consta na lista de sanções financeiras do Reino Unido (HM Treasury), para diligência de compliance e AML.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceScreen names against consolidated OFAC, EU, UK, and UN sanctions lists and resolve legal entities via GLEIF, with offline fuzzy matching.103 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceChecks names against US FinCEN financial crime lists for compliance and AML due diligence, with a single read-only tool.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceScreens names against the US Consolidated Screening List including OFAC SDN and BIS Entity List, keyless.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying global sanctions and politically exposed persons (PEP) data via OpenSanctions, with free access and no authentication required.2 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: screen_name screens names against the sanctions list, while get_sanctions_entry retrieves full details for a specific entry by ID. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: screen_name and get_sanctions_entry. This makes the action and target immediately clear.
With only two tools, the server is minimal but well-scoped for its purpose of sanctions screening and detail retrieval. It is slightly thin, but each tool serves a critical and distinct function.
The server covers the two primary actions needed for sanctions list interaction: screening a name and fetching a full entry. Missing tools like listing entries or regimes are minor gaps, but the core workflow is supported.