Skip to main content
Glama
coreason_multi_agent_debate

coreason_multi_agent_debate

Official
by CoReason-AI

coreason_multi_agent_debate

Dynamic multi agent debate MCP server

CI/CD PyPI PyPI - Python Version License Codecov Downloads Ruff Pre-commit

Getting Started

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.14+

  • uv

Installation

  1. Clone the repository:

    git clone https://github.com/CoReason-AI/coreason_multi_agent_debate.git
    cd coreason_multi_agent_debate
  2. Install dependencies:

    uv sync --all-extras --dev

Usage

  • Run the linter:

    uv run pre-commit run --all-files
  • Run the tests:

    uv run pytest

Available Tools

1 tool
multiagentdebateA

Structured multi‑persona debate tool.

Call sequence (typical):

  1. Each persona registers once with action:"register".

  2. Personas alternate action:"argue" (fresh point) or "rebut" (counter a targetAgentId).

  3. A special persona (or either side) issues action:"judge" with a verdict text (first line should be "pro", "con", or "inconclusive").

  4. Set needsMoreRounds:false only when the debate is finished and a verdict stands.

Parameters:

  • agentId (string) : "pro", "con", "judge", or any custom ID

  • round (int ≥1) : Debate round number

  • action (string) : "register" | "argue" | "rebut" | "judge"

  • content (string, optional) : Argument text or verdict

  • targetAgentId (string opt.) : Agent being rebutted (only for action:"rebut")

  • needsMoreRounds (boolean) : True if additional debate rounds desired

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
roundYes
actionYes
agentIdYes
contentNo
targetAgentIdNo
needsMoreRoundsYes

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool updatev0.1.7
    • First observedmultiagentdebate

TDQS

A4.8/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'multiagentdebate' is descriptive and uses consistent camelCase. There are no naming conflicts to evaluate.

Tool Count3/5

With just one tool, the server is minimal. While the tool is comprehensive for debates, a single tool feels slightly thin for typical MCP servers, but it is borderline acceptable for a niche function.

Completeness5/5

The tool covers the full debate lifecycle: registration, argument, rebuttal, and judging. All necessary actions are included, with no obvious gaps for the intended domain.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides formal reasoning and argument validation tools for AI agents based on established computational argumentation theories. It enables structured argument analysis, defeasible reasoning, and dialogue management using frameworks like Dung, Toulmin, and Walton's schemes.
    -