coreason_multi_agent_debate
OfficialClick on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@coreason_multi_agent_debatedebate the ethical implications of autonomous vehicles"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
coreason_multi_agent_debate
Dynamic multi agent debate MCP server
Getting Started
Prerequisites
Python 3.14+
uv
Installation
Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/CoReason-AI/coreason_multi_agent_debate.git cd coreason_multi_agent_debateInstall dependencies:
uv sync --all-extras --dev
Usage
Run the linter:
uv run pre-commit run --all-filesRun the tests:
uv run pytest
Available Tools
1 toolmultiagentdebateA
Structured multi‑persona debate tool.
Call sequence (typical):
Each persona registers once with action:"register".
Personas alternate action:"argue" (fresh point) or "rebut" (counter a targetAgentId).
A special persona (or either side) issues action:"judge" with a verdict text (first line should be "pro", "con", or "inconclusive").
Set needsMoreRounds:false only when the debate is finished and a verdict stands.
Parameters:
agentId (string) : "pro", "con", "judge", or any custom ID
round (int ≥1) : Debate round number
action (string) : "register" | "argue" | "rebut" | "judge"
content (string, optional) : Argument text or verdict
targetAgentId (string opt.) : Agent being rebutted (only for action:"rebut")
needsMoreRounds (boolean) : True if additional debate rounds desired
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| round | Yes | ||
| action | Yes | ||
| agentId | Yes | ||
| content | No | ||
| targetAgentId | No | ||
| needsMoreRounds | Yes |
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v0.1.7- First observed
multiagentdebate
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined.
The single tool name 'multiagentdebate' is descriptive and uses consistent camelCase. There are no naming conflicts to evaluate.
With just one tool, the server is minimal. While the tool is comprehensive for debates, a single tool feels slightly thin for typical MCP servers, but it is borderline acceptable for a niche function.
The tool covers the full debate lifecycle: registration, argument, rebuttal, and judging. All necessary actions are included, with no obvious gaps for the intended domain.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for building and testing AI agents with multi-model experimentation and insights.
AI Reasoning Cache & Consensus Layer with 11 MCP tools via Streamable HTTP.
NeuralBrain MCP Server - RAG, Vector Memory, LLM Routing, Agent Identity, x402 Payments
LLM Orchestration Agent (Mcp)
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides formal reasoning and argument validation tools for AI agents based on established computational argumentation theories. It enables structured argument analysis, defeasible reasoning, and dialogue management using frameworks like Dung, Toulmin, and Walton's schemes.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables multi-model debate and consensus building through a single tool. It orchestrates multiple AI models from various providers to debate topics and reach validated conclusions with real-time progress tracking.30 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI agents to conduct multi-LLM roundtable discussions, returning structured common, divergent, and unique perspectives.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that reduces confirmation bias in LLMs by orchestrating structured debates between asymmetric context sessions.13MIT