coreason_multi_agent_debate
Officialby CoReason-AI
README.md
# coreason_multi_agent_debate
Dynamic multi agent debate MCP server
[](https://github.com/CoReason-AI/coreason_multi_agent_debate/actions/workflows/ci-cd.yml)
[](https://pypi.org/project/coreason_multi_agent_debate/)
[](https://pypi.org/project/coreason_multi_agent_debate/)
[](https://github.com/CoReason-AI/coreason_multi_agent_debate/blob/main/LICENSE)
[](https://codecov.io/gh/CoReason-AI/coreason_multi_agent_debate)
[](https://pepy.tech/project/coreason_multi_agent_debate)
[](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff)
[](https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit)
## Getting Started
### Prerequisites
- Python 3.14+
- uv
### Installation
1. Clone the repository:
```sh
git clone https://github.com/CoReason-AI/coreason_multi_agent_debate.git
cd coreason_multi_agent_debate
```
2. Install dependencies:
```sh
uv sync --all-extras --dev
```
### Usage
- Run the linter:
```sh
uv run pre-commit run --all-files
```
- Run the tests:
```sh
uv run pytest
```
TDQS
A4.8/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name 'multiagentdebate' is descriptive and uses consistent camelCase. There are no naming conflicts to evaluate.
Tool Count3/5
With just one tool, the server is minimal. While the tool is comprehensive for debates, a single tool feels slightly thin for typical MCP servers, but it is borderline acceptable for a niche function.
Completeness5/5
The tool covers the full debate lifecycle: registration, argument, rebuttal, and judging. All necessary actions are included, with no obvious gaps for the intended domain.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues