get_shared_parameter
Retrieve a specific shared parameter by its ID. Access its details for test configuration.
Instructions
Get a specific shared parameter by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Entity ID (positive integer) |
Retrieve a specific shared parameter by its ID. Access its details for test configuration.
Get a specific shared parameter by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Entity ID (positive integer) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, etc. The description adds no extra behavioral context (e.g., what happens if ID not found). It merely restates the name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It is optimally concise for the simple operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read operation with good annotations, the description is mostly complete. It could mention the return type (no output schema) but is sufficient for an agent to infer.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the description does not add meaning beyond the schema's definition of 'id' as 'Entity ID (positive integer)'. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'specific shared parameter', and the method 'by ID'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'list_shared_parameters' which retrieves all parameters.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'list_shared_parameters'. It does not mention prerequisites or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/qase-tms/qase-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server