samsung_get_app_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description implies a read-only operation ('View') but does not disclose authentication requirements, error behavior, or any side effects. With no annotations, the description bears full burden and provides minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, but arguably too terse. It front-loads the purpose but omits important details, sacrificing helpfulness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is simple with one parameter, the description still lacks information about output, error handling, and authentication. It feels incomplete for an agent to correctly invoke.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the 'contentId' parameter beyond its name and pattern. No additional meaning is added for the agent to understand what value to provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('View') and the resource ('Seller's App Details'), with the HTTP endpoint providing additional context. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'samsung_api_request' which could also access this endpoint.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'samsung_api_request' or other platform-specific tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, authentication, or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.