Skip to main content
Glama
instagram-mcp-server

instagram-mcp-server

by qaassimq

Hide or Unhide Comment

instagram_hide_comment
Idempotent

Hide or unhide an Instagram comment from public view while keeping it visible to its author; use this reversible moderation action instead of deletion for borderline content.

Instructions

Hide a comment from public view, or unhide one.

Hiding is reversible and leaves the comment visible to its author — prefer it to deletion for borderline content. Use instagram_delete_comment only for comments on the account's own media that should be gone for good.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "comment_id": "<comment_id>"
    },
    "name": "instagram_hide_comment"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hideNotrue hides the comment, false unhides it
comment_idYesComment ID

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false and idempotentHint=true, but the description adds non-obvious behavior beyond them: the action is reversible and the comment stays visible to its author. It stops short of stating permission or ownership prerequisites (e.g., whether the comment must be on the account's own media), which would be the remaining behavioral gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the core action, then the reversibility rationale, then the routing to the sibling. No filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter mutation with no output schema, the description covers action, reversibility, visibility side effect, and the alternative. It does not mention what state is returned or any ownership/permission requirement, which is a minor but real gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already documents both the comment_id and the hide boolean with its default and true/false meaning. The description's phrasing 'unhide' only restates the hide=false case, so it adds little beyond the structured field.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Hide a comment from public view, or unhide one') including both directions of the toggle, and explicitly contrasts with instagram_delete_comment. An agent can distinguish it from every sibling comment tool without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit selection criteria: prefer hiding over deletion for borderline content because it is reversible, and reserve instagram_delete_comment for the account's own media that should be gone permanently. This covers both when to use this tool and when to use the alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.