roslyn:find_circular_dependencies

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description mentions output format but does not explicitly state it's read-only or disclose any side effects. Behavioral transparency is adequate for a simple detection tool but could be improved.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise: main purpose, two usage lines, output and use case. No unnecessary words. Information is front-loaded and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and lack of output schema, the description covers what the tool does, how to use it, and what to expect. Could mention read-only nature or behavior when no cycles found, but generally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the only parameter 'level'. Description adds usage context beyond schema, showing examples for both values and clarifying default behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it detects cycles in dependency graphs. Distinguishes from sibling roslyn:dependency_graph by focusing on cycle detection. Uses specific verb 'detect' and resource 'cycles in project or namespace dependency graphs'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides two explicit usage patterns (default and with level parameter) and states use case (architecture analysis). Does not mention when not to use or alternatives, but guidance is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.