getSuspendedListings
Retrieves a list of companies that have been delisted or suspended from the Taiwan Stock Exchange.
Instructions
Get companies that have been delisted or suspended
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieves a list of companies that have been delisted or suspended from the Taiwan Stock Exchange.
Get companies that have been delisted or suspended
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description solely bears the transparency burden. It states a read operation but omits details on data freshness, pagination, or return structure, making it insufficient for a tool with no annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words, effectively conveying the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool is simple, the lack of output schema means the description should hint at what fields are returned (e.g., ticker, name). It only says 'companies', which is vague, leaving some contextual gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and 100% schema coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description does not need to add parameter semantics, but it also provides no extra context beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'companies that have been delisted or suspended', which is specific and distinguishes it from siblings like getNewListings that deal with new listings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like getNewListings or searchStock, leaving the agent without context for choice.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pyang2045/twsemcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server