Skip to main content
Glama
pw5rhn4tnn-dotcom

mcp-project-helper

by pw5rhn4tnn-dotcom
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-project-helper

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • codex-mcp

      meesii
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A lightweight local coding MCP server that exposes a single project directory to ChatGPT via Streamable HTTP, enabling file operations, command execution, search, and web fetching without authentication.
      17 npm
      25
      MIT

    • local-terminal-mcp

      luckysolanki902
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets ChatGPT, Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and other MCP clients run an allowlisted set of local commands and read files from a chosen directory, so an assistant can analyse a codebase or trigger local generators (images, sprites, assets) without metered API tokens. The server is read-only and deny-by-default by default, with no shell, path containment, opt-in writes, and required auth when exposed over HTTP.
      3
      1
      MIT

    • Satori

      ham-zax
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Agent-safe code retrieval MCP server that indexes repositories and provides semantic search, file navigation, call graph analysis, and bounded file reading tools for coding agents.
      2,985,816 npm
      3
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    get_docs and search_project_files both search text, but get_docs is scoped to docs/ while search_project_files covers the entire project root. run_project_check and read_project_file are clearly distinct, so only minor overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_docs, run_project_check, search_project_files, read_project_file. The convention is predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a reasonable, well-scoped set for a project helper, though it sits at the lower end of the typical 3–15 range. Each tool has a clear purpose, but the set feels slightly thin for broader project assistance.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface is read-only and lacks file listing, write/edit operations, and general command execution. Core read/search/check operations are present, but notable gaps remain for a server named 'project helper'.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources