Skip to main content
Glama
pw5rhn4tnn-dotcom

mcp-project-helper

by pw5rhn4tnn-dotcom
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-project-helper

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • codex-mcp

      meesii
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A lightweight local coding MCP server that exposes a single project directory to ChatGPT via Streamable HTTP, enabling file operations, command execution, search, and web fetching without authentication.
      331
      20
      MIT

    • Satori

      ham-zax
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Agent-safe code retrieval MCP server that indexes repositories and provides semantic search, file navigation, call graph analysis, and bounded file reading tools for coding agents.
      2,731,155
      3
      AGPL 3.0

    • github-assistant-mcp

      imshashwatsingh
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets AI assistants inspect local workspace files, search context, view git diffs, and fetch a fixed GitHub profile, all within a sandboxed stdio transport.
      5
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    get_docs and search_project_files both search text, but get_docs is scoped to docs/ while search_project_files covers the entire project root. run_project_check and read_project_file are clearly distinct, so only minor overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_docs, run_project_check, search_project_files, read_project_file. The convention is predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a reasonable, well-scoped set for a project helper, though it sits at the lower end of the typical 3–15 range. Each tool has a clear purpose, but the set feels slightly thin for broader project assistance.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface is read-only and lacks file listing, write/edit operations, and general command execution. Core read/search/check operations are present, but notable gaps remain for a server named 'project helper'.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources