Skip to main content
Glama
pvliesdonk

scholar-mcp

by pvliesdonk

Related Servers

Alternatives to scholar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for scientific grounding: search and discover open-access research papers across arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar, and retrieve references/citations from paywalled journals via public DOI/abstract metadata.
      3
      225 PyPI
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for scientific literature search and extraction, integrating databases like Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and Unpaywall to enable AI agents to discover papers, track citations, and analyze content.
      27
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server for academic paper discovery, citation exploration, and research intelligence workflows over multiple scientific knowledge sources.
      7
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI-assisted research: paper ingestion, semantic search, citation graph traversal, cross-domain knowledge synthesis, and workflow automation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but get_paper, get_citations, get_references, get_citation_graph, and find_bridge_papers all relate to paper retrieval and could be confused. Descriptions clarify the differences, but an agent might misselect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_paper, search_books, generate_citations), with no deviations.

    Tool Count3/5

    21 tools is on the high side for a scholarly server, though many are necessary for diverse upstreams and background job handling. It's borderline heavy but not unreasonable.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers paper, author, citation, book, and standards domains with CRUD-like operations and background job management. Minor gaps like no update or delete operations for records, but those aren't typical for read-focused scholarly APIs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive