Skip to main content
Glama
pvfOliveira

aegis-crew

by pvfOliveira
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to aegis-crew

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agent-security-gateway

      Un1u6ky
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.
      -

    • MCP Enterprise Tool Gateway

      BhavikMoradiya
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An enterprise MCP server scaffold that provides secure, governed access to internal tools through RBAC, audit logging, rate limiting, and prompt-injection boundaries, with a FastAPI control plane and OpenTelemetry observability.
      MIT

    • MCP Airlock

      lara-muhanna
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure, zero-trust access to MCP tools through short-lived, signed capability leases that bind tool execution to specific sessions, intents, and constraints. Prevents prompt injection attacks and privilege escalation with dynamic risk scoring, policy enforcement, and tamper-evident audit logging.
      4
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: searching the knowledge base, reading a document, and publishing a report. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use snake_case and include a verb, but the pattern varies: kb_search_tool follows noun_verb_tool, while read_doc_tool and publish_report_tool follow verb_noun_tool. This minor inconsistency is still clear.

    Tool Count4/5

    With three tools, the set is minimal but fits a focused knowledge base and report creation workflow. It is not overly small given the scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover search, read, and publish, but lack update, delete, or list operations. For a basic workflow it is functional, but gaps exist for lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources