Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to state-memory-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that provides AI assistants with a shared, persistent SQLite-backed memory for storing and retrieving project context, decisions, and discoveries. It enables cross-session continuity and team-wide knowledge sharing to keep AI coding tools aligned and informed.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP memory server that gives AI assistants durable project memory across coding sessions, storing context, changes, and decisions.
      5 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides cross-session persistent memory for AI coding assistants using local vector database and semantic search, enabling automatic recall of project context, issues, and tasks.
      9
      91
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides offline-first, persistent memory for AI coding assistants. It captures project decisions and conventions into a local SQLite database and syncs them to tool-specific memory files like CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md.
      5 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Persistent memory server for AI assistants with semantic search and three-layer context (global, project, personality). Works with MCP-compatible AI tools like Claude Code, Cursor, Continue, Cline, and more.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct domain: snapshots, nodes, edges, sessions, tasks, specs, database, data, query, analytics, events, diagnostics, and blackboard. Even where actions overlap (e.g., query_graph vs. get_analytics), the intended use is distinct—topology vs. metrics. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (manage_*, query_*, get_*, run_*, use_*) with snake_case throughout. The verbs are semantically appropriate and the pattern is uniform across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 13 tools, the server is well-scoped for a state memory system. Each tool covers a distinct area and none feel redundant or excessive. The count falls within the ideal 3–15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set offers comprehensive coverage for graph CRUD, snapshots, sessions, specs, database maintenance, export/import, analytics, events, and diagnostics. A minor gap exists in manage_tasks: it lacks explicit create/update/delete actions, though tasks might be managed via nodes. Overall, the surface is nearly complete for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues