Skip to main content
Glama
putervision

agent-reasoning-mcp

by putervision
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-reasoning-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • narrative-runtime

      SanjoyDat1
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Goal-oriented narrative state machine for AI agents, exposing live world/scene context as MCP tools and resources.
      -

    • Summon-MCP

      ZionHopkins
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Objective-driven cognitive architecture engine that builds single experts, councils, or full autonomous organizations from user goals, generating deployment-ready superprompts and configurations.
      8 npm
      MIT

    • behavior-mcp

      putervision
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      High-frequency (~60Hz) in-browser behavior tree execution engine for autonomous AI agents. Reactive priority interrupts, safety guardrails & deterministic action replay over MCP.
      10
      9,149 npm
      23
      MIT

    • agent-task-planner

      xici001
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to decompose high-level goals into structured task plan DAGs with dependencies, acceptance criteria, and quality gates, and to validate or export those plans in multiple formats.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct concepts, and the descriptions actively disambiguate with explicit 'use X instead of Y' guidance (e.g. assess_risk vs evaluate_situation, set_goal vs manage_intentions). However there is a dense cluster of risk/utility evaluation tools (assess_risk, evaluate_situation, ask_score, gate_intention) that an agent could still misselect among.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set consistently uses snake_case verb_noun patterns (manage_beliefs, query_knowledge, get_decision_trace, set_utility_weights), with coherent families like ask_* and manage_*. Minor deviations are bare verbs (replan, classify) and an unusual token (ask_noul), but overall the convention is predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    15 tools sit at the upper edge of the comfortable 3-15 range but are justified by a genuinely broad cognitive-architecture domain (risk, beliefs, goals, intentions, knowledge, DB ops). It is slightly heavy but each tool maps to a real capability rather than being filler.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: beliefs (update/query/expire/reconcile), goals (create/update/decompose/get/list/abandon), intentions (create/dispatch/get/list/cancel/resolve) and traces/knowledge all form coherent lifecycles. Gaps are minor—no obvious delete or bulk-export for some resources—but core reasoning workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources