Skip to main content
Glama

API-patch-page

Update Notion page properties, including title, icon, cover, and trash status, using an API integration. Simplify page management and maintain consistency across workspaces.

Instructions

Notion | Update page properties

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
archivedNo
coverNoA cover image for the page. Only [external file objects](https://developers.notion.com/reference/file-object) are supported.
iconNoA page icon for the page. Supported types are [external file object](https://developers.notion.com/reference/file-object) or [emoji object](https://developers.notion.com/reference/emoji-object).
in_trashNoSet to true to delete a block. Set to false to restore a block.
page_idYesThe identifier for the Notion page to be updated.
propertiesNoThe property values to update for the page. The keys are the names or IDs of the property and the values are property values. If a page property ID is not included, then it is not changed.

Implementation Reference

  • The core handler function for executing any MCP tool call, including 'API-patch-page'. It resolves the tool name to an OpenAPI operation and proxies the HTTP request via HttpClient.
    this.server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
      const { name, arguments: params } = request.params
    
      // Find the operation in OpenAPI spec
      const operation = this.findOperation(name)
      if (!operation) {
        throw new Error(`Method ${name} not found`)
      }
    
      try {
        // Execute the operation
        const response = await this.httpClient.executeOperation(operation, params)
    
        // Convert response to MCP format
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text', // currently this is the only type that seems to be used by mcp server
              text: JSON.stringify(response.data), // TODO: pass through the http status code text?
            },
          ],
        }
      } catch (error) {
        console.error('Error in tool call', error)
        if (error instanceof HttpClientError) {
          console.error('HttpClientError encountered, returning structured error', error)
          const data = error.data?.response?.data ?? error.data ?? {}
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: 'text',
                text: JSON.stringify({
                  status: 'error', // TODO: get this from http status code?
                  ...(typeof data === 'object' ? data : { data: data }),
                }),
              },
            ],
          }
        }
        throw error
      }
    })
  • Registration of the listTools handler, which generates and lists all tools including 'API-patch-page' with names like 'API-{operationId}'.
    this.server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => {
      const tools: Tool[] = []
    
      // Add methods as separate tools to match the MCP format
      Object.entries(this.tools).forEach(([toolName, def]) => {
        def.methods.forEach(method => {
          const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
          const truncatedToolName = this.truncateToolName(toolNameWithMethod);
          tools.push({
            name: truncatedToolName,
            description: method.description,
            inputSchema: method.inputSchema as Tool['inputSchema'],
          })
        })
      })
    
      return { tools }
    })
  • Tool schema and lookup generation from OpenAPI spec. Tool names constructed as 'API-' + operationId (e.g., 'API-patch-page'). Input schemas derived from OpenAPI parameters and requestBody.
      for (const [path, pathItem] of Object.entries(this.openApiSpec.paths || {})) {
        if (!pathItem) continue
    
        for (const [method, operation] of Object.entries(pathItem)) {
          if (!this.isOperation(method, operation)) continue
    
          const mcpMethod = this.convertOperationToMCPMethod(operation, method, path)
          if (mcpMethod) {
            const uniqueName = this.ensureUniqueName(mcpMethod.name)
            mcpMethod.name = uniqueName
            mcpMethod.description = this.getDescription(operation.summary || operation.description || '')
            tools[apiName]!.methods.push(mcpMethod)
            openApiLookup[apiName + '-' + uniqueName] = { ...operation, method, path }
            zip[apiName + '-' + uniqueName] = { openApi: { ...operation, method, path }, mcp: mcpMethod }
          }
        }
      }
    
      return { tools, openApiLookup, zip }
    }
  • Initialization of tools and lookup map in MCPProxy constructor, linking tool names to OpenAPI operations.
      const converter = new OpenAPIToMCPConverter(openApiSpec)
      const { tools, openApiLookup } = converter.convertToMCPTools()
      this.tools = tools
      this.openApiLookup = openApiLookup
    
      this.setupHandlers()
    }
  • Helper function that executes the actual HTTP request for the resolved OpenAPI operation, handling params, file uploads, and errors.
    async executeOperation<T = any>(
      operation: OpenAPIV3.OperationObject & { method: string; path: string },
      params: Record<string, any> = {},
    ): Promise<HttpClientResponse<T>> {
      const api = await this.api
      const operationId = operation.operationId
      if (!operationId) {
        throw new Error('Operation ID is required')
      }
    
      // Handle file uploads if present
      const formData = await this.prepareFileUpload(operation, params)
    
      // Separate parameters based on their location
      const urlParameters: Record<string, any> = {}
      const bodyParams: Record<string, any> = formData || { ...params }
    
      // Extract path and query parameters based on operation definition
      if (operation.parameters) {
        for (const param of operation.parameters) {
          if ('name' in param && param.name && param.in) {
            if (param.in === 'path' || param.in === 'query') {
              if (params[param.name] !== undefined) {
                urlParameters[param.name] = params[param.name]
                if (!formData) {
                  delete bodyParams[param.name]
                }
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    
      // Add all parameters as url parameters if there is no requestBody defined
      if (!operation.requestBody && !formData) {
        for (const key in bodyParams) {
          if (bodyParams[key] !== undefined) {
            urlParameters[key] = bodyParams[key]
            delete bodyParams[key]
          }
        }
      }
    
      const operationFn = (api as any)[operationId]
      if (!operationFn) {
        throw new Error(`Operation ${operationId} not found`)
      }
    
      try {
        // If we have form data, we need to set the correct headers
        const hasBody = Object.keys(bodyParams).length > 0
        const headers = formData
          ? formData.getHeaders()
          : { ...(hasBody ? { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } : { 'Content-Type': null }) }
        const requestConfig = {
          headers: {
            ...headers,
          },
        }
    
        // first argument is url parameters, second is body parameters
        const response = await operationFn(urlParameters, hasBody ? bodyParams : undefined, requestConfig)
    
        // Convert axios headers to Headers object
        const responseHeaders = new Headers()
        Object.entries(response.headers).forEach(([key, value]) => {
          if (value) responseHeaders.append(key, value.toString())
        })
    
        return {
          data: response.data,
          status: response.status,
          headers: responseHeaders,
        }
      } catch (error: any) {
        if (error.response) {
          console.error('Error in http client', error)
          const headers = new Headers()
          Object.entries(error.response.headers).forEach(([key, value]) => {
            if (value) headers.append(key, value.toString())
          })
    
          throw new HttpClientError(error.response.statusText || 'Request failed', error.response.status, error.response.data, headers)
        }
        throw error
      }
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While 'Update' implies a mutation operation, the description doesn't disclose important behavioral aspects like required permissions, whether changes are reversible, rate limits, or what happens when properties are omitted. For a mutation tool with 6 parameters and no annotation coverage, this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at just 4 words, which is efficient and front-loaded. However, this brevity comes at the cost of completeness - it could benefit from one additional sentence about scope or constraints to be optimally helpful without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with 6 parameters, nested objects, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what happens when properties are updated, what the response looks like, or any error conditions. The high schema coverage helps, but the description itself doesn't provide enough context for safe and effective tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is high (83%), providing good documentation for most parameters. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, only confirming this is for updating page properties without providing additional context about parameter usage, relationships, or edge cases. The baseline of 3 is appropriate given the schema does most of the documentation work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update') and resource ('page properties'), and the 'Notion' prefix provides context about the service domain. However, it doesn't differentiate this tool from sibling tools like 'API-update-a-block' or 'API-update-a-database' which also perform updates on different Notion resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of when this tool is appropriate versus other update tools like 'API-update-a-block' or 'API-update-a-database', nor does it specify any prerequisites or constraints for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/punkpeye/notion-mcp-server-3'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server