mcp-harbor-search
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-harbor-search
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that searches 3,800+ open-source AI agents by capability, ranked by real traction (stars, activity). Query it from Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, or Windsurf.349 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFinds the right MCP server for a task from over 1,400 indexed servers ranked by community trust. Also provides outcome-ranked web search for AI agents with no API key or rate limits.4-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching a directory of public MCP servers by text, category, transport, language, official or remote status, and scoring a public website for AI-agent readiness from 0 to 100.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA general-purpose MCP server providing web search, persistent memory storage, and secure code execution capabilities. It enables AI agents to search the web, store and retrieve data, and run Python/JavaScript code in sandboxed environments.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP tool server that gives any AI agent the ability to search, scrape, and analyze content across the internet.42MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search a directory of 13,870+ MCP servers, 4,384+ agent skills, and plugins from Remote OpenClaw, returning install commands directly.349 npm6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: search_tools finds listings by keyword/category, while get_tool retrieves a specific listing by slug. There is no realistic overlap or ambiguity in selection.
Both names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern, search_tools and get_tool. Singular/plural use is natural and predictable.
A two-tool search-and-detail surface is minimal but well matched to a directory lookup server. The count is slightly thin under the general 3-15 guideline, but each tool earns its place.
The core lifecycle of searching the directory and fetching a specific listing is covered. Minor gaps could include browsing all entries or listing categories, but agents can work around these via search.