project-knowledge-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to project-knowledge-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAI-native code intelligence graph that builds a persistent knowledge graph of your codebase in Neo4j and exposes it to AI assistants via MCP, enabling contextual code analysis, impact analysis, and dependency tracking.23-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides code intelligence for AI coding agents by indexing repositories into a hybrid knowledge graph, enabling agents to query dependencies, impact, and context through 28 MCP tools.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to query a codebase as a knowledge graph, providing token-budgeted context, search, and impact analysis via MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that builds a dependency graph of your codebase, giving AI agents structural understanding to analyze impact, find context, and make safe modifications across languages and infrastructure.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides AI agents with a function-level dependency graph of the codebase through 30 MCP tools, enabling structural queries about code dependencies, callers, and impact analysis.1,555 npm95Apache 2.0

NEAT MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides AI agents with a live architecture model of a codebase, enabling queries for root cause analysis, blast radius, and dependency traversal through MCP tools.175 npm19Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is slight overlap between reverse_lookup (find references by file) and check_type_mapping (find references by type), and between suggest_type_mappings (auto-detect) and register_type_mappings (manual registration). However, descriptions clarify the intended use for each.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., register_project, get_feature, validate_knowledge). Even 'reverse_lookup' and 'search' fit a predictable style, making the set easy to navigate.
With 16 tools, the set is well-scoped for managing projects, features, type mappings, and knowledge base operations. Each tool serves a distinct function without unnecessary bloat, and the count is appropriate for the domain.
Core operations for projects, features, and type mappings are covered, including create/update/remove/read. Minor gaps exist: there is no explicit 'list_projects' or 'list_features' tool, requiring reliance on search or memory to enumerate items, but this is workable.