medwriter-mcp
# medwriter-mcp
[](https://mcpize.com/mcp/medwriter)
**The Medical Writer's AI Toolkit — 34 expert prompts as callable MCP tools.**
Built by a CMPP-certified medical writer with a PhD and 10+ years in pharma. Gives Claude and any MCP-compatible AI agent direct access to publication-ready prompt frameworks for every stage of the pharma medical writing workflow.
---
## Plans & tiers
| Tier | Tools | Access |
|------|-------|--------|
| Free | 8 starter tools | $0/mo · 25 requests · install and use immediately |
| Pro | All 34 tools + ADAPT framework | $39/mo ($374/yr) · 1,000 requests |
| Business | All 34 tools + ADAPT framework | $89/mo ($854/yr) · 5,000 requests |
| Ultra | All 34 tools + ADAPT framework | $129/mo ($1,238/yr) · 10,000 requests |
**Free tier** includes 8 starter tools (manuscript outline, abstracts, and core IMRaD section drafting). Paid tiers unlock the full **Manuscript Toolkit** — all 26 advanced tools plus the ADAPT framework.
---
## Tools
### ✅ Free tier
| Tool | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `get_manuscript_outline_prompt` | Create a detailed manuscript outline with section word counts |
| `get_structured_abstract_prompt` | Draft a CONSORT/STROBE-aligned structured journal abstract |
| `get_unstructured_abstract_prompt` | Draft a narrative (unstructured) journal abstract |
| `get_introduction_section_prompt` | Draft a manuscript Introduction section |
| `get_methods_section_prompt` | Draft a manuscript Methods section |
| `get_results_section_prompt` | Draft a manuscript Results section |
| `get_discussion_section_prompt` | Draft a manuscript Discussion section |
| `list_all_tools` | List every tool available in the toolkit |
### 🔐 Paid tiers — 26 additional tools across 9 chapters (Pro, Business, Ultra)
**Chapter 1 — Abstract writing**
- Convert structured → unstructured abstract
- Rewrite weak conclusions to be data-anchored
- Adapt abstracts for different audiences
**Chapter 2 — Manuscript development**
- Draft Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion sections
- AMA style, CONSORT/STROBE aligned
**Chapter 3 — Peer review**
- Evidence-based rebuttal to reviewer disagreement
- Cover letter for revised manuscript submission
**Chapter 4 — Congress abstracts and posters**
- ASCO, ASH, ESMO, APA congress abstracts
- Declarative poster titles and take-home messages
- Timed oral presentation scripts
**Chapter 5 — Slide deck narratives**
- Slide-by-slide deck outlines by audience type
- Speaker notes for data slides
- Mechanism of action slide copy
**Chapter 6 — Publication planning**
- Publication plan framework table
- Literature and data gap analysis
- Executive summary for medical affairs leadership
- Journal selection with rationale (top 3 journals)
**Chapter 7 — Author collaboration**
- Author review request with deadline
- Response to author major revision request
**Chapter 8 — Editing, QC and style**
- Comprehensive AMA-style manuscript edit
- Promotional language check for MLR pre-review
- Statistical reporting consistency check
**Chapter 9 — Career and professional development**
- CV tailoring for ATS keyword alignment
- CMPP exam practice question generator
- Medical writing interview prep with STAR frameworks
**Bonus — ADAPT framework**
- Layer Audience, Document type, Accuracy level, Purpose, and Tone onto any prompt in the library
---
## Quickstart
### Install
```bash
git clone https://github.com/pubspro/medwriter-mcp.git
cd medwriter-mcp
pip install mcp
```
### Add to Claude Desktop
Edit `%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json` (Windows) or `~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json` (macOS):
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"medwriter-mcp": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/medwriter-mcp/server.py"]
}
}
}
```
Restart Claude Desktop. All tools appear automatically.
### Add to Claude Code
```bash
claude mcp add medwriter-mcp python /absolute/path/to/medwriter-mcp/server.py
```
---
## Example prompts
Once connected, ask Claude:
```
Use get_structured_abstract_prompt to draft an abstract for a Phase 3 RCT
of pembrolizumab in NSCLC. Primary endpoint: PFS HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.46–0.72, p<0.001).
```
```
Use get_gap_analysis_prompt to identify publication gaps for a BTK inhibitor
in CLL based on the current literature landscape.
```
```
Use get_congress_abstract_prompt to draft an ASH abstract for a study
of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab in previously untreated CLL.
```
```
Use get_promotional_language_check_prompt to review this slide deck excerpt
before MLR submission.
```
```
Use apply_adapt_framework to rewrite this abstract for a nursing audience
at a health literacy reading level.
```
---
## Data safety
Every prompt is structured so you never need to input unpublished, confidential, or proprietary data. Tools marked 🔒 carry elevated data-sensitivity risk and include inline guidance.
**Never input into any public AI tool:**
- Unpublished clinical trial data
- Patient-level or identifiable data
- Proprietary compound information or IP
- Data under NDA or confidentiality agreement
- Pre-decisional regulatory documents
Always comply with ICMJE, GPP4, and your organization's AI use policies.
---
## Who this is for
- Medical writers at associate through director level
- Publication managers and medical affairs professionals
- Pharmacists, physicians, and researchers moving into medical writing
- CMPP candidates preparing for certification
---
## Companion servers
Pair with other `pubspro` MCP servers for a complete pharma AI workflow:
- [pharma-mcp](https://github.com/pubspro/pharma-mcp) — ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, FDA, ICH guidelines
- [pubmed-search](https://github.com/pubspro/pubmed-search) — PubMed literature search
- [medterms-mcp](https://github.com/pubspro/medterms-mcp) — ICD-10, MedDRA, RxNorm, CTCAE
---
## Requirements
- Python 3.8+
- mcp (`pip install mcp`)
---
## License
MIT
This server cannot be deployed
TDQS
Scored across 34 tools
Each tool targets a specific medical writing task (e.g., drafting a specific section, generating a prompt for a particular document) with no overlap. Even closely related tools like get_structured_abstract_prompt and get_unstructured_abstract_prompt are clearly differentiated by their output format.
Tools follow a consistent get_[task]_prompt or apply_[framework] naming pattern in snake_case, making it easy to infer purpose. The only outlier is list_all_tools, which is still intuitive and serves a distinct discoverability role.
With 34 tools, the count is on the higher side but well-justified given the broad scope of medical writing—covering abstracts, manuscripts, presentations, publication planning, and compliance. No tools seem superfluous, and the set is not overwhelming.
The tool surface covers the full medical writing workflow: planning, drafting (every manuscript section, abstracts, posters, slides), editing, peer review response, and compliance checks. Obvious gaps are minimal; the set is comprehensive for its domain.