Skip to main content
Glama
publicaml

PublicAML MCP Server

Official
by publicaml

Related Servers

Alternatives to PublicAML MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Routes blockchain address screening to third-party KYC/AML providers and checks public sanctions lists, serving as a clean-money gate primitive for MCP-compatible agents.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Crypto APIs AML, enabling verification of blockchain addresses and screening of transactions for fraud, sanctions, and other AML risk categories.
      2
      27 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform AML and compliance risk scoring for crypto addresses and transactions on Ethereum, BSC, TRON, TON, and Bitcoin, returning 0–100 risk scores, bands, flags, and detailed signals.
      2
      51 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AML/KYT crypto wallet screening, enabling AI clients to check wallet risk scores, source-of-funds tags, activity dates, and volume totals via Satoshkin backend.
      1
      33 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides blockchain address risk scoring and asset information through the BICScan API, allowing users to assess risks for crypto addresses, domains, and dApps on a scale of 0-100.
      2
      17
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a different AML task (address screening, fund tracing, counterparty listing), but trace_funds (incoming) and list_counterparties (classify/category) both surface who a wallet interacted with, creating some boundary blur. Descriptions clarify scope, so misselection is unlikely but possible.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (screen_address, trace_funds, list_counterparties). No deviations, making the set predictable and easy to scan.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for a focused AML API, and each tool encapsulates a distinct, multi-purpose operation (screening, tracing, counterparty analysis). No tool feels redundant or missing.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core AML workflows: risk/sanctions screening, fund tracing, and counterparty classification. Minor gaps exist, such as batch address screening or granular transaction-level retrieval, but agents can work around them for most use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues