PublicAML MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to PublicAML MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AML screening of blockchain addresses against OFAC SDN lists and chain heuristics, returning risk scores and flags.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRoutes blockchain address screening to third-party KYC/AML providers and checks public sanctions lists, serving as a clean-money gate primitive for MCP-compatible agents.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Crypto APIs AML, enabling verification of blockchain addresses and screening of transactions for fraud, sanctions, and other AML risk categories.227 npmMIT

traql MCP serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform AML and compliance risk scoring for crypto addresses and transactions on Ethereum, BSC, TRON, TON, and Bitcoin, returning 0–100 risk scores, bands, flags, and detailed signals.251 npmMIT- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for AML/KYT crypto wallet screening, enabling AI clients to check wallet risk scores, source-of-funds tags, activity dates, and volume totals via Satoshkin backend.133 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides blockchain address risk scoring and asset information through the BICScan API, allowing users to assess risks for crypto addresses, domains, and dApps on a scale of 0-100.217MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a different AML task (address screening, fund tracing, counterparty listing), but trace_funds (incoming) and list_counterparties (classify/category) both surface who a wallet interacted with, creating some boundary blur. Descriptions clarify scope, so misselection is unlikely but possible.
All three names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (screen_address, trace_funds, list_counterparties). No deviations, making the set predictable and easy to scan.
Three tools is well-scoped for a focused AML API, and each tool encapsulates a distinct, multi-purpose operation (screening, tracing, counterparty analysis). No tool feels redundant or missing.
Covers core AML workflows: risk/sanctions screening, fund tracing, and counterparty classification. Minor gaps exist, such as batch address screening or granular transaction-level retrieval, but agents can work around them for most use cases.