A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that wraps the Taskwarrior CLI to allow AI assistants to create, query, modify, and manage tasks directly from agentic coding tools.
13 npm
MIT
tasq
by ptucholski
Related Servers
Alternatives to tasq
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA personal task management MCP server that allows LLM clients to create, read, update, and delete tasks with projects, labels, and comments, using a local SQLite database that can also be accessed via a web UI.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with the Taskwarrior command-line task management tool. It allows users to list, create, modify, and organize tasks using projects, tags, and annotations through natural language.132MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first task management with CLI, TUI, and REST API. MCP server enables Claude to manage tasks, track time, optimize schedules, and handle dependencies.26352MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage tasks with full lifecycle support including due dates, priorities, tags, subtasks, and project lists via 19 SQLite-backed MCP tools.4-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA task-based AI orchestrator that bridges AI models (Gemini, Claude, OpenAI) with local environments, operating as an interactive CLI and an MCP server for structured autonomous development.27 npmMIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 19 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: tasks, projects, labels, sessions, attention flags, and bulk ingestion. Overlap is minimal, and descriptions clearly distinguish search_tasks from search_references and agenda from plan.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (add_task, list_tasks, edit_task, link_session). A few exceptions like 'ingest', 'agenda', and 'plan' deviate from this pattern but remain readable and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
With 19 tools covering task CRUD, status transitions, projects, labels, sessions, and planning, the count is well-scoped for the server's purpose. It is neither overly sparse nor bloated.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers most lifecycle needs: create/read/update/transition tasks, manage projects and labels, link sessions, and flag attention. Minor gaps exist, such as no hard delete for tasks and no session listing, but these are workable.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessSyncing