Skip to main content
Glama
ptbsare

terminal-mcp-server

by ptbsare

Related Servers

Alternatives to terminal-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables remote server management via SSH, including command execution, file transfer (SFTP), and interactive shell sessions, with support for multiple hosts.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure SSH connections to remote servers for executing shell commands and managing active sessions. It supports authentication via passwords or private keys and provides optional host-based access control.
      4
      179 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables SSH connections and remote command execution with persistent session management and real-time browser-based terminal monitoring. Supports multiple simultaneous SSH sessions with command history tracking and live WebSocket streaming of terminal output.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables SSH remote command execution on remote machines with persistent connections, supporting automatic key discovery and connection pooling.
      2
      8 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables SSH remote command execution, passwordless key management, Windows Session 0 desktop process launching, and SFTP file transfers across Windows, Linux, and macOS.
      8
      3 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so no ambiguity exists between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly stated to execute commands on remote or local hosts.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool is named 'execute_command', which follows a clear verb_noun pattern. Consistency is trivially maintained with only one tool.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server provides a single tool, which feels thin for a terminal server. While the tool is broad, additional tools for file operations or process management would be expected.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers basic command execution, which is the core functionality. However, it lacks features like interactive session handling, background process management, or file transfer, which are common gaps for terminal servers.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues