instrument_ea_for_opt

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description omits behavioral traits such as file modifications, overwriting behavior, success/failure signals, or required file structure. The agent cannot predict side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (two sentences plus args) and directly readable. However, some behavioral details could be added without harming conciseness, keeping it efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core purpose and parameter but lacks completeness for a file-modifying tool. No mention of return values, side effects, or success conditions. Given no output schema, more context would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds meaning by specifying 'Absolute path to the .mq5 file' for the sole parameter ea_path. While brief, this clarifies the parameter role beyond the schema's type-only definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: automatically instrument an MQL5 Expert Advisor (.mq5) file with OptExport.mqh logging. The verb 'instrument' and resource are specific, distinguishing it from sibling tools like compile or deploy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or exclusions. The description lacks context about the tool's place in the workflow, leaving the agent to infer usage from the name and siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.