A
licenseA
qualityF
maintenanceAn MCP server that provides full read/write access to OmniFocus, enabling AI assistants to manage tasks, projects, folders, tags, and perspectives via 51 tools, resources, and prompts.
51
10 npm
21
MIT
OmniFocus MCP Plus
by psufka
Related Servers
Alternatives to OmniFocus MCP Plus
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI assistants full control over OmniFocus on macOS, including tasks, projects, tags, folders, perspectives, forecast, notifications, and review workflows.43MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with OmniFocus on macOS via JXA, supporting task, project, folder, tag, perspective, and search operations.3110 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server that exposes OmniFocus as structured task infrastructure for AI agents, enabling read, write, and filter operations on tasks and projects via natural language.8-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnhanced Model Context Protocol server that transforms OmniFocus into an AI-powered productivity tool with comprehensive task management capabilities including subtask support, perspective views, advanced filtering, and custom perspective access.25248 npm62MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables automation and management of OmniFocus tasks, projects, and tags using natural language and programmable interfaces from VS Code, command line, or any MCP-compatible client.12MIT
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 53 tools
Disambiguation2/5
Several task-retrieval tools overlap substantially: filter_tasks can express flag, tag, date, project, and inbox queries, yet dedicated get_flagged_tasks, get_today_completed_tasks, get_inbox_tasks, get_forecast_tasks, and get_tasks_by_tag are also present. Single/batch variants and complete_task/edit_item create further selection ambiguity. Descriptions help, but an agent will often have multiple valid tools for the same request.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern such as list_projects, create_tag, delete_folder, and complete_task. Exceptions like server_info, analyze, and app_control, plus mixed object specificity (add_omnifocus_task vs add_project), keep it from being fully consistent.
Tool Count2/5
53 tools is well over the threshold where agents can easily navigate a tool list. Many tools are parameterized variants of one another—single vs batch, generic filter vs specialized getters—so the count feels inflated rather than curated.
Completeness4/5
The server covers task/project CRUD, folders, tags, notifications, attachments, reviews, perspectives, and app control, so there are no obvious dead ends. Minor gaps remain, such as no create/delete for custom perspectives and no dedicated get-project-by-id, but core OmniFocus workflows are well covered.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues