browser_maximize
Increases the browser window to full screen, providing a consistent viewport size for reliable automated testing.
Instructions
Maximize the browser window
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Increases the browser window to full screen, providing a consistent viewport size for reliable automated testing.
Maximize the browser window
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as effect on other windows, whether it triggers fullscreen or just expands, or any side effects. The description is tautological with the tool name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (4 words, one sentence). Front-loaded. However, it is so minimal that it might be considered under-informative, but still earns its place without verbosity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks clarification on what 'maximize' entails (e.g., fullscreen or just maximum size) and any preconditions. Missing context for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has zero parameters (100% coverage), so the description adds minimal meaning beyond the name. Baseline of 4 applies per rules, but description adds no new semantic value, warranting a slight reduction.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action 'maximize' on the resource 'browser window', which is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like browser_resize (set dimensions) and browser_open (open new window).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., browser_resize, browser_fullscreen if existed). Does not mention prerequisites (window must be open) or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pshivapr/selenium-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server