mcp-data-agent
# mcp-data-agent
A real [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) (MCP) server
that lets an agent explore a database **safely and read-only**, plus an agent
client that answers natural-language questions by discovering and calling the
server's tools over stdio.
## Problem statement
Giving a language-model agent direct database access is useful and risky in
equal measure: the same connection that answers "which plan has the most
subscribers?" can also run a `DELETE`. This project demonstrates the middle
path — an MCP server that exposes exactly three read-only tools over a real
database, enforces read-only access at several independent layers, and an
agent client that must explore the schema before it is allowed to query.
The whole loop runs offline with a deterministic planner, so anyone can
clone it, run one command, and watch every tool call happen.
## Architecture
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Client as Agent client (client.py)
participant Planner as Planner (llm.py, MockLLM by default)
participant Server as MCP server (server.py, official mcp SDK)
participant DB as SQLite (data/app.db, read-only)
User->>Client: "which plan has the most subscribers?"
Client->>Server: spawn subprocess, JSON-RPC over stdio, initialize
Client->>Server: list_tools
Server-->>Client: list_tables, describe_table, run_query
loop Until the planner stops
Client->>Planner: next step? (question + observations so far)
Planner-->>Client: tool call
Client->>Server: call_tool(name, arguments)
Server->>DB: validated SELECT (read-only connection)
DB-->>Server: rows
Server-->>Client: JSON result
Client->>Client: record observation
end
Client->>Planner: summarise(question, observations)
Planner-->>Client: plain-English answer
Client-->>User: tool-call trace + final answer
```
Components:
| Path | Role |
|---|---|
| `src/mcp_data_agent/server.py` | MCP server on the official Python `mcp` SDK (v1), stdio transport |
| `src/mcp_data_agent/tools.py` | Transport-independent tool logic (unit-testable) |
| `src/mcp_data_agent/safety.py` | Read-only SQL validation and LIMIT capping |
| `src/mcp_data_agent/db.py` | Deterministic seed data (seed 42): telecom / e-commerce |
| `src/mcp_data_agent/client.py` | Agent client: session, tool discovery, call loop |
| `src/mcp_data_agent/llm.py` | Planner interface, deterministic `MockLLM`, optional env-configured provider |
| `src/mcp_data_agent/demo.py` | One-command offline demo |
## Quickstart
```bash
python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install -e '.[dev]'
# Run the demo (seeds the database on first run, spawns the server over stdio)
.venv/bin/python -m mcp_data_agent.demo "which plan has the most subscribers?"
# Other questions it answers
.venv/bin/python -m mcp_data_agent.demo "what is the total revenue?"
.venv/bin/python -m mcp_data_agent.demo "how many customers are there?"
.venv/bin/python -m mcp_data_agent.demo "which customers spend the most?"
# Run the server on its own (speaks MCP on stdin/stdout)
.venv/bin/python -m mcp_data_agent.server
# Tests (fully offline)
.venv/bin/python -m pytest
```
## Captured demo output
Real output, captured from an actual run of
`.venv/bin/python -m mcp_data_agent.demo "which plan has the most subscribers?"`
(long result lines are shortened by the demo printer itself, with `...`):
```text
Question: which plan has the most subscribers?
Tools discovered: list_tables, describe_table, run_query
Tool calls:
1. list_tables()
-> {"tables": [{"name": "customers", "row_count": 1200}, {"name": "invoices", "row_count": 4200}, {"name": "plans", "row_count": 6}, {"name": "subscriptions", "row_count": 1800}]}
2. describe_table({"table": "plans"})
-> {"table": "plans", "columns": [{"name": "id", "type": "INTEGER", "nullable": true, "primary_key": true}, {"name": "name", "type": "TEXT", "nullable": false, "primary_key": false}, {"name": "monthly_price_usd", "type": "REAL", "nullable": false, "primary_key": false}, {"name": "data_gb", "type": "INTEGER", "nullable": f...
3. describe_table({"table": "subscriptions"})
-> {"table": "subscriptions", "columns": [{"name": "id", "type": "INTEGER", "nullable": true, "primary_key": true}, {"name": "customer_id", "type": "INTEGER", "nullable": false, "primary_key": false}, {"name": "plan_id", "type": "INTEGER", "nullable": false, "primary_key": false}, {"name": "status", "type": "TEXT", "nulla...
4. run_query({"sql": "SELECT p.name AS plan, COUNT(*) AS subscribers FROM subscriptions s JOIN plans p ON p.id = s.plan_id GROUP BY p.name ORDER BY subscribers DESC LIMIT 5"})
-> {"columns": ["plan", "subscribers"], "rows": [{"plan": "Pro", "subscribers": 515}, {"plan": "Unlimited", "subscribers": 449}, {"plan": "Plus", "subscribers": 281}, {"plan": "Starter", "subscribers": 248}, {"plan": "Enterprise", "subscribers": 176}], "row_count": 5, "limit": 100, "truncated": true, "sql": "SELECT p.name...
Final answer: The plan with the most subscribers is Pro with 515 subscriptions.
```
A static version of this recorded run is also in
[`web/index.html`](web/index.html) — open it in any browser, no server needed.
## Dataset
Synthetic, neutral commercial data generated deterministically
(`random.Random(42)`, standard library only) on first use:
| Table | Rows | Contents |
|---|---:|---|
| `customers` | 1,200 | name, email, city, country, segment |
| `plans` | 6 | Basic, Starter, Plus, Pro, Unlimited, Enterprise |
| `subscriptions` | 1,800 | customer → plan, status, dates |
| `invoices` | 4,200 | subscription billing, amount, paid / pending / overdue |
Re-seed any time with `.venv/bin/python -m mcp_data_agent.db`
(the database file itself is git-ignored; the seed script is the source of
truth). Point the tools at a different database with `MCP_DATA_AGENT_DB`.
## Safety model
`run_query` is the only tool that touches user-shaped input, and it is
defended in depth — each layer would stop a write on its own:
1. **Lexical validation** (`safety.py`): the query must be a single
statement starting with `SELECT` (or `WITH … SELECT`). Write / DDL /
admin keywords (`INSERT`, `UPDATE`, `DELETE`, `DROP`, `ALTER`,
`CREATE`, `PRAGMA`, `ATTACH`, …), SQL comments, and multiple
statements are rejected before anything executes.
2. **Row limit**: a `LIMIT` is always applied and capped at 100 rows —
a query asking for `LIMIT 1000` is silently capped, not trusted.
3. **Read-only connection**: SQLite is opened with a `mode=ro` URI, so
the engine itself refuses writes.
4. **Engine authorizer + timeout**: user SQL runs under a SQLite
authorizer that allows only `SELECT` / read / function actions, and a
progress-handler deadline aborts queries after 5 seconds.
`list_tables` and `describe_table` run only hardcoded internal queries;
`describe_table` validates the requested name against the real table list
instead of interpolating untrusted input.
## Design decisions
- **Real SDK, thin server.** The server uses the official Python `mcp`
SDK (pinned to the v1 line in `pyproject.toml`, where the server class
used here is stable). It is a thin wrapper: all logic lives in
`tools.py`, so it is testable without a subprocess.
- **Planner interface, not a model dependency.** The client depends on a
two-method planner protocol (`next_step` / `summarise`). The default
`MockLLM` is a deterministic, heuristic planner: schema first
(`list_tables`, then `describe_table` for the tables the question
touches), then one aggregate query built from the question pattern,
then a templated answer. No keys, no network, reproducible runs.
- **Optional real provider via environment only.** If
`MCP_DATA_AGENT_LLM_ENDPOINT`, `MCP_DATA_AGENT_LLM_MODEL` and
`MCP_DATA_AGENT_LLM_API_KEY` are all set, `planner_from_env()` swaps in
an `EnvLLM` that talks to that generic chat-completions style endpoint
with the standard library. No provider is hardcoded or required.
- **Deterministic data.** Fixed-seed generation means tests can assert
exact counts and the demo answer never drifts between machines.
- **stdio transport.** The simplest real MCP transport: no ports, no
network surface, and the server lifecycle is owned by the client.
## Limitations
- The heuristic planner covers a bounded set of question patterns
(subscribers, revenue, averages, top customers, counts, per-city,
plan prices) and falls back to a customer count. It is a stand-in for a
model, not a replacement for one.
- SQLite only, and a single bundled dataset. Other databases would need
a different connection / authorizer layer behind the same tools.
- Lexical SQL validation is conservative by design: some legitimate
read queries (for example, ones containing SQL comments, or the word
`into` in a string literal) are rejected.
- One query per question in the default planner; multi-step analysis
(query, inspect, query again) is a property of the interface, not of
the mock.
- stdio transport only — no HTTP / remote hosting in this version.
## Tests
```text
10 passed
```
Covering: table listing and exact seeded counts, schema description,
SELECT execution, rejection of `DELETE` / `UPDATE` / `INSERT` / `DROP` /
multi-statement payloads (with data verified untouched), row-limit
enforcement (explicit limit and hard cap), and an integration test that
launches the real server over stdio, discovers its tools, and completes
one question end to end, cross-checked against a direct query.
## License
MIT — see [LICENSE](LICENSE).
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools target clearly distinct operations: listing tables, describing a single table's schema, and executing a SELECT query. There is no overlap between schema discovery and query execution, so an agent can easily select the right tool.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_tables, describe_table, run_query. The convention is predictable and readable throughout.
Three tools is a tight, well-scoped surface for a read-only data agent: each tool earns its place and covers a necessary stage of exploration. There are no redundant or filler tools.
The surface covers the core read-only workflow: discover tables, inspect schema, then query data. Minor gaps like schema/table search or query plan explanation exist, but agents can work around them with the provided tools.