Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to archviz_mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and read a local library of saved prompts, skills, MCP servers, and design boards, fill prompt blanks, and retrieve board design briefs through read-only, offline tools, prompts, and resources.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to discover live visual design references, inspect original sites as MCP images, analyze elements and motion, and verify implementation constraints during an original design workflow.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run live web searches, fetch and navigate readable web pages, search images, capture PDF screenshots, and retrieve finance, weather, sports, and world-time data through a zero-configuration authenticated backend.
      11
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search apps, screens, flows, site sections, and collections, and capture them into a project-aware local reference store for reuse through skills, MCP tools, prompts, contact sheets, and exports.
      15 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role: reporting sources, searching candidates, reading project details, and viewing a single gallery image. The search/read/view split is clear, and descriptions explicitly state boundaries such as search returning candidates versus read returning verified project content.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern: search_references, read_reference, view_reference_image. reference_sources is a noun phrase rather than an action, but it is still readable and semantically appropriate as a metadata/reporting tool.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools are well scoped for a focused workflow around searching, reading, and visually inspecting OfficeNext references. It is slightly thin but each tool earns its place without unnecessary overlap.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers source discovery, keyword search, project reading, and image viewing, which is a coherent lifecycle for the stated reference-inspection purpose. Minor gaps include no browse/list operation independent of search and no batch image viewing, but these are workable limitations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues