gh-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gh-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server exposing GitHub tools for issues, pull requests, and code browsing via the GitHub REST API. Designed for local LLM clients with flat arguments and streamable HTTP support.15-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that wraps the GitHub REST API into tools for repo queries, issue/PR management, code review, search, and authentication, letting coding agents operate GitHub directly in conversations.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGitHub MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible client. Exposes GitHub tools (issues, pull requests, code search, file content) to your LLM via the Model Context Protocol.7MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA GitHub MCP server that wraps the gh CLI to expose GitHub operations like issues, pull requests, branches, labels, repositories, CI actions, and Projects V2 as tools for MCP clients.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes GitHub operations as tools for AI agents, enabling code search, issue management, and PR review.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server that provides LLMs with safe, structured, tool-based access to GitHub repositories, including issue management, semantic search, and guarded write operations.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: github_code_search is for exact substring searching of code files, while github_graphql is a general-purpose interface for all other GitHub queries and mutations. There is no functional overlap that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool.
Both tools follow a consistent naming pattern of 'github_<descriptive_noun>', using snake_case. The naming is predictable and clearly indicates the tool's domain and action.
With only two tools, the server is minimal. The GraphQL tool is extremely powerful and can handle many operations, but it lacks dedicated tools for common GitHub tasks, making the surface feel incomplete for typical use cases.
The tool set lacks dedicated tools for fundamental GitHub operations such as listing repositories, creating issues, or managing pull requests. While the GraphQL tool can theoretically perform these, the absence of pre-built abstractions creates a significant gap in usability and increases complexity for agents.