Skip to main content
Glama

submit_evidence

Provide a factual account of a payment dispute to help jurors understand your perspective and resolve the escrow conflict.

Instructions

Publish evidence for an existing dispute. Call exactly as: {"tool":"submit_evidence","args":{"paymentAddress":"0x...","argument":"short factual explanation"}}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
argumentNoA factual account of what happened with this payment, from your perspective. Jurors will read this to understand the context of the dispute.
paymentAddressYesThe DisputablePayment contract address
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Mentions that jurors read evidence but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, or limits. No annotations provided, so more detail expected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with a clear code block; no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Sufficient for a simple tool with two params; lacks behavioral details but overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage; description only adds a usage example without significant new meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'Publish' and resource 'evidence for an existing dispute' distinguishes from sibling tools like raise_dispute which creates the dispute.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides an example call format but does not explicitly state when to use this vs alternatives like raise_dispute or refund.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/programmaman/dpay-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server