lexml_explain
Retrieve LexML SRU service metadata to understand available search features and parameters.
Instructions
Retrieve metadata about the LexML SRU service (explain operation).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve LexML SRU service metadata to understand available search features and parameters.
Retrieve metadata about the LexML SRU service (explain operation).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states 'retrieve metadata' but fails to disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., authentication, rate limits, data format).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, zero waste. Perfectly concise for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description is mostly complete. Minor gap: could mention what metadata is returned (e.g., service capabilities).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds nothing beyond the schema but is not required to. Baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses specific verb 'retrieve' and resource 'metadata about the LexML SRU service', clearly stating what the tool does and distinguishing it from siblings (search and resolve URN).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus lexml_search or lexml_resolve_urn. Usage is implied but not explicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/prof-ramos/LeXML-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server