A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI coding agents to plan, policy-check, and cost-estimate Terraform changes while requiring human approval through Slack or CLI before any terraform apply can execute.
9
7 npm
MIT
blastcheck-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to blastcheck-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to search a security corpus, scan Terraform plan JSON for cited findings, and list sources via MCP tools grounded in CIS AWS Foundations and OWASP Top 10 CI/CD risks.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to scan Terraform and Dockerfiles for security misconfigurations, returning structured Checkov findings that can be explained in plain language.2MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with dependency analysis, impact detection, and build verification tools.14-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to scan code for security and quality issues and receive machine-readable reports with suggested fixes and verification criteria.136 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to analyze git diffs for behavior-aware change reports, map downstream blast radius, and enforce deterministic risk gates through the Model Context Protocol.32 npm4MIT
TDQS
A4.7/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct roles: impact_emit produces a manifest from a Terraform plan, while impact_explain consumes an existing manifest and explains it. There is no overlap or possible misselection between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow the same predictable prefix-plus-verb pattern: impact_emit and impact_explain. The naming is consistent and immediately signals the shared domain and the action each tool performs.
Tool Count3/5
Two tools is on the thin side by the general rubric, but the server has a very narrow purpose: emit and explain impact manifests. The pair is reasonable for that scope, though it barely crosses the 'feels thin' boundary.
Completeness5/5
For the stated domain, the lifecycle is complete: impact_emit generates a manifest from a plan, and impact_explain supports all reasonable input paths (handle, file, or inline) and offers filtering for drill-down. There are no obvious missing operations for this focused workflow.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues