get_service

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The word 'Fetch' strongly indicates a read-only operation with no side effects. While no explicit side-effect disclaimer is given, the described behavior is transparent and aligned with a safe retrieval action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that contains all essential information without unnecessary words or repetition. It is efficiently structured and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is sufficient for a get-by-ID operation, especially given the sibling tool context. It lacks an output schema, but the phrase 'full details' gives a reasonable expectation; this is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, serviceId, is clearly described as 'The Topmate service ID' and is marked as required. This fully explains its meaning and role in the operation, with no ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Fetch'), the target ('full details for one Topmate service'), and the selection criterion ('by its ID'). This is specific and unambiguous, and it naturally distinguishes this tool from list operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when a single service is needed by ID, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this over list_services or other sibling tools. The guidance is present implicitly but not explicitly articulated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.