No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct step in the vulnerability workflow (inventory, per-program detail, CVE matching, CVE lookup, to-do listing, assessment, saving). The only soft overlap is assess_todo vs save_assessment, since assess_todo can either store a verdict itself or return an evidence package for save_assessment, but the descriptions explicitly clarify this two-path relationship.
Six of seven tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (scan_inventory, get_program, check_cves, list_todos, assess_todo, save_assessment). Only cve_detail breaks the pattern with a noun_noun form, a minor deviation in an otherwise predictable scheme.
Seven tools is well-scoped for an inventory/CVE assessment server. Each tool maps to a clear pipeline stage and none appears redundant or filler.
The core lifecycle is covered: scan inventory, match CVEs, populate and list to-dos, assess them, and persist assessments. Minor gaps exist around to-do state management (e.g. dismissing/closing items or explicit status transitions beyond the assessment write-back), but agents can work around these.
