Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to winadmin-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely query and manage Windows services, processes, event logs, and system information, with write actions disabled by default.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to operate and monitor Windows workspaces through native tools for filesystem operations, PowerShell execution, background tasks, Windows services, GPU telemetry, PDF generation, and a built-in web gateway/dashboard.
      58 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to securely control and interact with a local Windows machine through 218 configurable tools for files, Git, processes, Windows UI, browser automation, WSL, Office, recovery, skills, and child MCP servers.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely perform file operations, run terminal sessions, manage processes, search content, and inspect Git repositories on a local Windows machine under configurable permission and audit controls.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform comprehensive Windows system health diagnostics, security checks, developer workflows, and maintenance tasks via 85 tools with actionable recommendations, over MCP and OpenAI-compatible HTTP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A lightweight server that enables AI agents to interact with the Windows operating system, allowing for file navigation, application control, UI interaction, and QA testing through various tools.
      11,011
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct roles: one lists pending destructive actions and the other confirms a specific action by confirmation_id. There is no overlap in action or resource, so an agent can easily choose between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use snake_case and follow a predictable verb_noun style (list_pending, confirm_action). No mixed casing or inconsistent verb conventions are present.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is borderline thin for an admin approval workflow, even though each tool has a distinct purpose. The set would feel better scoped with at least one additional operation such as reject or cancel.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface covers listing pending actions and confirming them, but omits rejecting/denying, canceling, retrieving details, and viewing history. These are significant gaps for a safe destructive-action approval workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues