Skip to main content
Glama
princeruhulofficial

mcp-agent-reliability

by princeruhulofficial
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-agent-reliability

Related Servers

  • Token Guardian MCP

    KitsuneTech1
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server that reports token usage by agents and models, and recommends the cheapest safe model and effort level for a given task, helping to reduce token waste.
    2
    1
    MIT

  • mcp-compressor

    atlassian-labs
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A proxy server that wraps existing MCP servers to significantly reduce token consumption by compressing tool descriptions into a two-step interface. It enables users to integrate extensive toolsets without exceeding context limits or incurring high API costs.
    128
    Apache 2.0

  • mcp-audit

    nyx-builds
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that gives AI agents observability over their own tool calls, enabling auditing, cost tracking, latency analysis, and alerting.
    MIT

  • clair

    concensure
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that reduces token usage by lazily loading skills and tools only when needed, and routing repetitive subtasks to ML backends instead of the LLM.
    -
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct aspect of agent reliability: scoring descriptions, estimating token costs, simulating tool choice, generating test prompts, and producing a combined report. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most names follow a clear verb_noun pattern (score_tool_description, estimate_token_cost, simulate_tool_choice, generate_agent_tests), but 'reliability_report' deviates as a noun_noun construction. The pattern is mostly consistent with one minor deviation.

Tool Count5/5

At 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of assessing and improving MCP tool reliability. Each tool serves a distinct function without redundancy or bloat.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the core lifecycle: evaluating descriptions, estimating cost, predicting selection, generating tests, and summarizing results. A minor gap is the lack of direct test execution or runtime monitoring, but the provided surface is reasonably complete for its intended scope.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources