mcp-agent-enterprise-guard
README.md
# mcp-agent-enterprise-guard
**Compute trust scores, permission decisions, and silent-failure risk for AI agents — pure local computation, zero API cost.**
Built for founders and teams who need lightweight AI governance (especially those validating products with Prevalid).
[](https://mcpize.com/servers/mcp-agent-enterprise-guard)
## Why this exists
AI agents often fail *silently*: they return empty results, pick the wrong tool, or violate simple policies without raising an error. Enterprise-style workflows (Salesforce, ServiceNow, internal data) make this painful and expensive.
This MCP server gives your agent (or your ops team) four practical tools that run entirely on the data you already have — no external APIs, no monthly data bills.
## Tools
| Tool | What it does |
|------|--------------|
| `score_agent_reliability_tool` | 0–100 reliability score + breakdown + recommendations |
| `detect_silent_failures_tool` | Finds empty/null responses that did not set `is_error` |
| `evaluate_permission_tool` | Simple allow/deny rule engine for agent actions |
| `generate_audit_report_tool` | Human-readable markdown governance report |
## Quick start (local)
```bash
git clone https://github.com/princeruhulofficial/mcp-agent-enterprise-guard.git
cd mcp-agent-enterprise-guard
pip install -e .
python -m agent_enterprise_guard.server
```
Or with FastMCP / Claude Desktop config:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"agent-enterprise-guard": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "agent_enterprise_guard.server"]
}
}
}
```
## Example usage
Feed your agent run logs (list of dicts with `tool_name`, `success`, `latency_ms`, `is_error`, `content`) and get a reliability score + silent-failure list in seconds.
## Monetization (MCPize)
Freemium model planned:
- Free: limited daily calls for testing
- Pro / Team / Enterprise tiers with higher limits and report export
## License
MIT
---
Made for the Prevalid community — build AI systems people can actually trust.
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a distinct purpose: detecting silent failures, scoring reliability, evaluating permissions, and generating audit reports. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun_tool pattern (detect_silent_failures_tool, score_agent_reliability_tool, etc.), making the API predictable and easy to navigate.
Tool Count5/5
With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its enterprise guard purpose. Each tool serves a distinct function without unnecessary bloat or a thin set.
Completeness5/5
The tools cover the full lifecycle of governance and monitoring: detection, scoring, permission evaluation, and reporting. No obvious gaps exist for the server's stated purpose.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues