add_agent

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral aspects. It states the tool adds an agent and returns an ID and key, but doesn't detail side effects, uniqueness constraints, or error conditions. This is adequate but leaves gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear docstring format, front-loading the main action. It includes Args and Returns sections without unnecessary fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given two parameters and no annotations, the description covers the core functionality, input guidance, and return value. It lacks error handling or prerequisites, but is sufficient for a simple creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description adds crucial meaning. It provides examples for both parameters ('webserver-01' for name, '10.0.0.10' for ip) and explains 'any' for dynamic IPs, which is essential for correct usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Add a new agent to the OSSEC manager' and explains the registration process. It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_agents and remove_agent by focusing on creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It mentions that the agent will need to be authenticated and configured after addition, providing some context. However, it doesn't explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, though the purpose is distinct.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.