Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SAP CPI MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for monitoring and managing SAP Cloud Integration (CPI) tenants via OData APIs, supporting multi-tenant configurations and extensive tools for message logs, integration flows, deployments, and admin operations.
      46
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage SAP Cloud Integration (CPI) landscapes through natural language by exposing CPI OData APIs as MCP tools.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SAP Cloud Integration (CPI) that exposes OData APIs as MCP tools, allowing AI assistants to manage integration content, monitor message processing, and configure security artifacts through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Claude to SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI) to diagnose failed messages, review iFlows, deploy artifacts, and check credentials directly from your conversation.
      13
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 44 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools have clear descriptions and distinct purposes, but the large number (44) and multiple tools for similar resources (e.g., 6 for message processing logs) create some potential for confusion. Overall, descriptions help differentiate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_integration_package, search_message_processing_logs). However, a few use a 'cpi_' prefix as a domain marker (cpi_api_catalog, cpi_get_entity), deviating slightly from the pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 44 tools, the set exceeds the 'too many' threshold (25+). While SAP CPI is a broad domain, this many tools may overwhelm agents and increase selection errors.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface extensively covers integration package/flow lifecycle, deployments, monitoring, security, and configuration. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit tool for managing routing rules or alerts), but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues