Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-uimax

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides professional UI/UX design expertise and frontend development tools for analyzing interfaces, generating design systems, and creating modern components with accessibility and best practices built-in. Supports React, Vue, Angular and other frameworks with seamless Claude Code CLI integration.
      4
      23
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to capture and analyze web page screenshots, responsive layouts, and page metadata using Puppeteer. It allows developers to perform visual UI inspections and compare designs across various viewports directly within the terminal.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Core Web Vitals analysis powered by Lighthouse. Four tools: analyze a URL, compare two URLs, check against thresholds, or crawl an entire site. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI tool.
      4
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI design fidelity — compare Figma designs or screenshots against the rendered implementation and get structured discrepancies. Uses your Claude Code or Codex subscription, no API keys.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with advanced frontend debugging capabilities through 36 specialized tools for inspecting React/Vue/Angular/Svelte applications. Uses Playwright browser automation and source map intelligence to analyze components, network requests, bundle optimization, and resolve production errors.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes (e.g., multiple performance audits, multiple comparison tools, and a 'primary' review tool that subsumes many others). Agents will struggle to choose the correct tool due to redundant functionality and unclear boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., capture_console, check_budgets), but some deviate (lcp_optimization, responsive_screenshots). Overall, the naming is readable and predictable, with only minor inconsistencies.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 37 tools, the server is overly bloated for its domain. Many tools are highly specific (e.g., check_dark_mode) and could be merged. This volume increases cognitive load and reduces efficiency.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers nearly all aspects of UI auditing: accessibility, performance, SEO, visual comparison, interaction testing, and reporting. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no dedicated mobile viewport testing beyond responsive screenshots), but overall it is comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues