A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceGenerates or reviews code patches via TIMI CC's API, returning validated Git unified diffs restricted to allowed paths.
7
MIT
DeepSeek MCP Patch Worker
Related Servers
Alternatives to DeepSeek MCP Patch Worker
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRead and propose changes to an Obsidian vault through git-apply-able diffs, with a security model that prevents the AI from ever writing to the vault directly.12 npmMIT
CodePeel MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to review code diffs for bugs, security issues, and bad patterns, and generate fixes.4MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables code-review gating by converting a git diff into a typed verdict with safety probabilities, severity, and recommended actions for auto-merge or human review.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Codex to delegate routine repository exploration, implementation, refactors, tests, and fixes to DeepSeek Harness in isolated Git worktrees, returning compact results and patches for review while keeping the main workspace protected.55 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables bounded, local coding tasks to be delegated to OpenAI-compatible models with explicit working directory and read/write paths, pre-application unified-diff validation, and optional verification commands. It routes tasks by complexity and risk, while blocking sensitive changes such as auth, payment, secrets, migrations, database, deployment, or production environments.5MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 7 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct operation: generating, reviewing, submitting, canceling, and querying patches. The get_patch_job and get_patch_result are clearly differentiated by status vs. result.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., cancel_patch_job, get_patch_result). No mixed conventions or vague verbs.
Tool Count5/5
7 tools is well-scoped for a patch generation and management server. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy or excessive granularity.
Completeness4/5
The set covers the full lifecycle of patch jobs (generate, review, submit, cancel, monitor, retrieve). Minor gaps exist, such as a tool to list all jobs or delete old results, but core workflows are complete.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues