Skip to main content
Glama

youtube_list_playlists

Read-only

List playlists owned by the selected creator profile, using page tokens and max results to browse results in pages.

Instructions

List playlists owned by the selected creator profile.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "youtube_list_playlists"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageTokenNoPage token from the nextPageToken of a previous response, to fetch the next page.
maxResultsNoMaximum number of items to return, 1-50; omit to use the tool default.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / maxResults / description
      Added value: +"Maximum number of items to return, 1-50; omit to use the tool default."
    • addedInput schema / properties / pageToken / description
      Added value: +"Page token from the nextPageToken of a previous response, to fetch the next page."
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint=true already establishes the safety profile, so the description only needs to add context. It adds the useful ownership constraint (only creator-owned playlists, not subscribed or saved ones), but says nothing about pagination behavior, ordering, or what a result contains, which matters for a paged list endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single well-formed sentence with zero waste and the scope qualifier placed where it matters. It is efficient, though its brevity leaves it thin rather than front-loaded with a lot of value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter read tool with full schema coverage and an executing readOnlyHint, the description covers the essential who/what. With no output schema, however, it provides no indication of the returned shape or list semantics, leaving a real gap for an agent planning a paginated listing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: pageToken and maxResults (1-50) are fully documented in the schema. The description contributes no additional parameter meaning, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb ('List') plus resource ('playlists') plus a scope qualifier ('owned by the selected creator profile'), which separates it from the single-playlist sibling youtube_get_playlist and from youtube_list_playlist_items. It stops short of explicitly naming the sibling it is not, but the resource distinction is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The scope phrase 'owned by the selected creator profile' implies usage (read-only enumeration within a creator context) but gives no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative naming. An agent must infer from the tool name that this is a listing rather than a retrieval.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools