Shutdown Device
shutdown_deviceShut down an Android device using its serial number.
Instructions
Shut down a specific Android device using its serial number.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| serial | Yes |
shutdown_deviceShut down an Android device using its serial number.
Shut down a specific Android device using its serial number.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| serial | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states the action without noting power-off effects, permission requirements, or error conditions. This is insufficient for safe invocation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, direct sentence with no extraneous words. Every word provides value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple, one-parameter tool, the description is incomplete. It omits usage context, permissions, and return behavior (no output schema). Gaps exist in guidelines and transparency.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description mentions 'using its serial number' but provides no additional semantics (e.g., format, validation, or source) beyond the schema. With 0% schema description coverage, the lack of detail hurts usability.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('shut down'), the resource ('specific Android device'), and the required input ('serial number'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'reboot_device'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use shutdown vs reboot, prerequisites (e.g., device must be connected), or serial number format. The description is functional but lacks decision-making support.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/prashant1507/android-device-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server