Skip to main content
Glama

load_article_to_context

Load arXiv article content into LLM context by searching with the article title, enabling analysis of scholarly papers.

Instructions

Load the article hosted on arXiv.org into context. This tool searches for the article based on its title, retrieves the article content, and loads text content into LLM context.

Args: title: Article title.

Returns: Article as a text string or error message.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYes

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function decorated with @mcp.tool(), implementing the core logic: searches arXiv by title, downloads PDF, extracts full text using PyMuPDF (fitz), and returns the article content as a string.
    @mcp.tool()
    async def load_article_to_context(title: str) -> str:
        """
        Load the article hosted on arXiv.org into context. This tool searches for the article based on its 
        title, retrieves the article content, and loads text content into LLM context.
    
        Args:
            title: Article title.
    
        Returns:
            Article as a text string or error message.
        """
        result = await get_url_and_arxiv_id(title)
        if isinstance(result, str):
            return result
        article_url, _ = result
        pdf_doc = await get_pdf(article_url)
        if pdf_doc is None:
            return "Unable to retrieve the article from arXiv.org."
        pymupdf_doc = fitz.open(stream=pdf_doc, filetype="pdf")
        content = ""
        for page in pymupdf_doc:
            content += page.get_text()
        return content
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but provides minimal behavioral details. It mentions searching and retrieving content, but doesn't disclose error handling, rate limits, authentication needs, or what 'loads text content into LLM context' entails operationally. The return statement adds some value but remains vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and concise, with a clear purpose statement followed by Args and Returns sections. Each sentence adds value, though the return statement could be more specific about error conditions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and low schema coverage, the description is minimally adequate. It covers the basic purpose and parameter use but lacks details on behavioral traits, error handling, and output format beyond 'text string or error message', leaving gaps for a tool that interacts with an external service.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaningful context for the single parameter 'title' by specifying it's used to search for the article on arXiv.org. With 0% schema description coverage and only one parameter, this adequately compensates, though it doesn't detail format constraints like exact match requirements.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Load the article hosted on arXiv.org into context' with specific actions (search, retrieve, load text). It distinguishes from siblings like 'download_article' (which might save files) and 'search_arxiv' (which might return metadata), but doesn't explicitly contrast them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'download_article' or 'search_arxiv'. The description implies usage for loading article content into context, but lacks explicit when/when-not instructions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/prashalruchiranga/arxiv-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server