List MindSpark maps

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

ReadOnlyHint and openWorldHint annotations already cover safety. The description adds behavioral context by stating it returns 'all' maps, implying a complete listing, and specifies the fields returned. This goes beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly conveys the purpose and output without any redundant wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains what is returned and the scope (user's maps). It does not mention pagination or error cases, but for a simple list operation with no parameters, this is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, so there is no ambiguity. The description does not contradict the schema and requires no additional explanation for parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'mind maps', with explicit output fields (id, title, last-updated time). It is immediately distinct from get_map (retrieves one) and other mutating tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for obtaining all maps in the user's collection, contrasting with get_map for a single map. Explicit alternatives are not named, but the context is clear enough for an agent to choose correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.