Skip to main content
Glama
prandogabriel

IEEE 2030.5 MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to IEEE 2030.5 MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides electricity tariff queries and rate calculations for US utilities, enabling cost estimation and optimal charging schedules.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables multi-agent orchestration of distributed energy resources through MCP tools, including simulation, real-time telemetry, dispatch control, and deterministic safety gatekeeping for grid support and demand response.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing distributed industrial asset data (battery storage, EV chargers, solar arrays) with tools for asset status, geospatial search, alerts, anomaly explanation, and load simulation.
      851 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to look up solar permitting authorities, estimate solar production via PVWatts, and retrieve irradiance data. It streamlines the creation of solar-aware workflows by integrating industry-standard APIs like NREL.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI agents to energy infrastructure with 30+ tools for managing sites, assets, dispatch, settlements, compliance, and carbon tracking.
      34
      26 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Wraps the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory developer API, enabling access to renewable energy data through an MCP interface.
      8 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming is trivially consistent. The name follows a clear pattern (ieee2030_status).

    Tool Count1/5

    The server claims to cover IEEE 2030.5, a complex standard, but offers only one tool. This is an extreme mismatch for the apparent scope.

    Completeness1/5

    A single status-check tool is severely insufficient for the domain. Essential operations like configuration, device management, and data exchange are missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues