Skip to main content
Glama
pranciskus

Garmin Workouts MCP

by pranciskus
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Garmin Workouts MCP

Related Servers

  • garmin-mcp

    aapiskotin
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables creating, previewing, scheduling, and managing Garmin Connect workouts, plus reading activities and health metrics, all through a local MCP server.
    11
    MIT

  • Garmin Connect MCP

    LePomas
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Exposes personal Garmin Connect data to MCP-capable clients like Claude and Gemini. Enables querying daily stats, heart rate, sleep, activities, and managing workouts.
    16
    MIT

  • garmin-mcp

    gabecorsini
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Personal MCP server for interacting with your Garmin Connect data. Exposes 62 tools across 11 domains including activities, health, training, and workouts.
    1
    MIT

  • garmin-mcp

    aayush-lunawat
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A local MCP server that exposes your Garmin Connect data—sleep, HRV, training readiness, workouts, and more—to any MCP-compatible AI assistant. Runs entirely on your machine and keeps your Garmin credentials private.
    MIT

  • Garmin MCP

    lokranjanp
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that exposes Garmin Connect health and activity data (steps, sleep, stress, activities, etc.) via tools for querying, analysis, and visualization.
    17
    Apache 2.0
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

D1.8/5.0

Scored across 15 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Most tools target distinct actions (list, get, delete, upload, validate) but there is some overlap in workout-related operations like generate_workout_data_prompt, preview_workout_payload, and get_workout_input_schema which may confuse an agent. Also, list_workouts and list_activities are distinct but could be ambiguous without descriptions.

Naming Consistency4/5

The majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_workouts, delete_workout, validate_workout, get_activity). However, 'resolve_supported_strength_exercise' and 'generate_workout_data_prompt' deviate slightly from the simpler pattern of other tools, introducing minor inconsistency.

Tool Count4/5

Fifteen tools is within a reasonable range for a workout management server, covering CRUD, validation, preview, and activity retrieval. The count feels slightly heavy but each tool seems to serve a purpose, and it is not excessive for the apparent feature set.

Completeness4/5

The server covers core workout lifecycle operations (list, get, upload, delete) plus validation, preview, and schema retrieval. Missing update functionality for workouts is a notable gap, but the domain appears covered for typical workout management workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources